Laserfiche WebLink
14 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> So I do believe that it is clarifying to use the <br /> word "native" rather than the word "natural, " although I <br /> feel perhaps we could have that in order to use the word <br /> "natural" by a careful definition of what one meant by it, <br /> 0 <br /> KKR. VIDAL: Mr. Chairman. <br /> rn <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: Mr. Vidal. <br /> MR. VIDAL: For the point that occurs in my mind, I <br /> don' t see that it makes any particular difference. I think <br /> in view of the fact that we are dealing here with the water <br /> of the Arkansas River Basin, which, of course, is derived <br /> and comes from precipitation. If they have a plan of opera- <br /> tion or whatever recommendations you make as to a basis of <br /> allocation for reconsideration, and you use a certain word, <br /> with the definition attached to it, and it is used all the <br /> way through the same way, why, you can goon with that. I <br /> don' t see that otherwise it makes much difference, I don't <br /> know, <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: If I get your view correctly, Mr. <br /> Vidal, it concurs with mine, we could, if we wanted to, call <br /> it black water and white water, provided we define the terms <br /> black and white and use them consistently. The label we put <br /> on is purely immaterial, providing it is clear and unambigu- <br /> ous and consistently used. <br /> Our reason basically for introducing this subject <br /> of a definition goes to the point you just made, Mr. Vidal, <br />