Laserfiche WebLink
A <br /> m <br /> 3 <br /> A <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> n <br /> correction, and I afforded them the opportunity to edit their <br /> remarks. As the result of that, I have been informed by Mr. - <br /> Debler that his copy as well as Kr. Dixon's copy are being <br /> used to prepare a unified correction. I called Mr. Debler ° <br /> early this week and learned he was out of the city until after <br /> the 4th of July. I have not yet received the corrected trans- <br /> cript from the Department of the Interior and, as sir. Noe <br /> has reported, our lotion on the record mut nesessarilr be <br /> held in abeyanee until that step has been ooapleted. <br /> Concurrently, some editing of remarks by the vari- <br /> ous Commissioners and myself will also be made in that trans- <br /> cript which will form a part of the record of our previous <br /> meeting. <br /> Mr. Noe has indicated that we are ready to sot on <br /> the first part of the record. It is true we have edited and <br /> completed the eorrsetian of that, Mr. Sapp, Mr. Vidal and <br /> myself having done that yesterday in ea000rdanae with our es- <br /> tablished procedure. I doubt whether it is desirable to act <br /> formally upon the approval of the record in 1.=arts. I suggest, <br /> if there is no objection, that we carry over the approval of <br /> txe entire record until the second part is ready for correc- <br /> tion. Is there any objection to that procedure? (Ho response. ) <br /> So be it. <br /> At this juncture I would like to introduce a thought <br /> for your consideration with respect to our record-keeping and <br />