Laserfiche WebLink
m <br /> 21 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> feet. To be left Panty except where you do control minor <br /> flows and get thew out , and waiting for a day that a major <br /> flood occurs, of course, you will need All of that space. The <br /> H <br /> suggestion here, of course, is that you coordinate John t artin 0 <br /> with reservoirs perhaps under the general planning of the <br /> 0 <br /> Gunnison-Arkansas project. The statement, specifically, is <br /> water exchanged to facilitate power production and to augment `�� <br /> control of flood waters and their Conservation for beneficial <br /> use. So he is taking in the whole scope there. <br /> He speaks specifically that he admits that no capacity is <br /> available in the reservoir for imps° ted water as ouch because <br /> it has all Osen dedicated, we will say, by Congress, to the two <br /> types of uses for which it was authorised, namely, for the con- <br /> trol of floods and the conservation of Arkansas River water <br /> for the irrigation interests of Colorado and Kansas. <br /> He says that does not preolude operating agreements or <br /> exchange use of capacity. He suggests that the only practical <br /> way is a substitution upstream from Cadc oa of flood control <br /> capacity in reservoirs on tributaries of the proposed Gunnison- <br /> Arkansas project. He admits that would never reduce the capa- <br /> city at Caddoa for flood control and enable an alternative use <br /> of such capeoity for water-regulating purposes. <br /> Now, specifically, it would mean thisi That if he should <br /> build a reservoir of a flood control capacity, say on the St. <br /> Charles River, Fuerfano River or any of those, as he mentions <br />