Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> m <br /> 20 <br /> CHAIRMAN KPtA p_}: I am glad you breogut that out, Or. <br /> Knapp. And that is, in part, at leant, an answer to your <br /> queetion, Mr. Vidal. If their plan* will involve a ooneerva- <br /> 0 <br /> ton pool, then our operating etudiee are affected if we cave <br /> any ohange in the flood control pool which is operated by the <br /> War Department. When the water get. to flood stage in the <br /> reservoir, 5801, then it has relatively little offset in our <br /> studies which dial, primarily, with the operation of the +ion- <br /> nervation pool. Of course, the spills from the flood pool are <br /> P <br /> P P <br /> a factor In the operation of the conservation pool, and to that <br /> extent we would be interested. <br /> Is there any other discussion? <br /> MR. PATTSRSONk May I offer a thought there, General# <br /> CHAIRMAN K. AMA; t$ tee, Mr. Patterson, of course. <br /> Ka. PAg `FRa9Nt I have made some notes of the thing, that <br /> Kr. Dobler said, particularly as a representetivee of the De- <br /> partment of the Interior. And I believe he ha.e gone eo for <br /> here that it is going to 4e necessary to muggeet by someone <br /> that we talk over the possibilittee of using the flood pool <br /> for purpoees that he outlined with the Army engineers <br /> I can conceive that if the Army engineer* should enter <br /> into any agreement on this ezohangs basis th}fit then if this <br /> Compact Commission is not interested, our State board is. <br /> I want to explain What I dean by that. We have a atruoture <br /> there with a capacity designed to control flows as great as the <br /> flood of Juno, 19E1. Spealftoally, it involved 270,000 acre <br />