Laserfiche WebLink
m <br /> 1t <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> C <br /> n <br /> MR. VIDALt Mr. Chairman, as I read Mr. Doblerr q statement <br /> ta(i fundamental idea he expressed was that we, by our Compact, -1 <br /> dig not preclude a possible arrangement that they could or might <br /> or hope to make concerning an operating agreement which might <br /> involve an exchange of capacity. It might involve retention <br /> of sedimentation, and so forth. But the fundamental thing <br /> was that we do not preclude them from making such an arrangement <br /> if the war Department agreed to it. <br /> blow, I have not been able to, and our Committee has <br /> not been able to devise any language, general or epeoific, <br /> particularly in view of the fact that we have no definite sug- <br /> gestion from them unless we consider this from Mr. Debler <br /> something definite but which we are all opposed to; and we can, <br /> as I say, take the position that nothing they do or say does <br /> preclude it, except our reservation or implied reservation or <br /> the fundamental right to object to anything like that that is <br /> done if we find it objectionable. <br /> I take that what we are considering now ae a suggestion, <br /> that an invitation be extended by the Chairman to representatives <br /> of the Corps to meet with us. When I say "definite action" I <br /> mean to say we necessarily will agree on a olauc.e at that time. <br /> That might clarify the situation in such a way that we could <br /> take definite action. <br /> CKAIRMAX KRAMER: It appears to me, Mr. Vidal, that the <br /> sequence of our action should be about as follows: riret, we <br />