Laserfiche WebLink
m <br /> 22 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> n <br /> m <br /> 0 <br /> n <br /> historical records of diversions, without trying to cal- <br /> m: <br /> oulate the effeot of diversions in beneficial or consumptive <br /> use. I am a little afraid if you do adopt the particular <br /> paragraph XI (a ) we might get into two points of discussion. <br /> The allocations hereinabove made are not going to be < <br /> based upon beneficial consumptive use, if you follow any of <br /> :t44killans that your I ngineering Committee_ has been inveati <br /> gating. And second, it seems to me that you are in that para- <br /> graph assigning to the State of Colorado the consumptive use <br /> of water from Caddoa Reservoir itself simply because it is <br /> located in the State of Colorado. I think our understanding <br /> is these consumptive uses of water at Caddoa will not be part <br /> of the allocated waters for diversion and use in the two <br /> states. <br /> Perhaps I am straining at gnats here, but it seems to <br /> me that in addition to our desire to clarify these relative <br /> rights of the United States versus the two states we should <br /> if possible avoid complicating the basis upon which our allo- <br /> cations and the division of water are proposed to be made in <br /> the terms they are proposed to be made. <br /> MR. VIDAL: Well, Paragraph (a) answering Mr. Patterson,-- <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: Of Article XI? <br /> MR. VIDAL: Of Article XI is intended to bring the <br /> United States-.-not as the United States Government, but as a <br /> possible irrigator or consumer of water, within the provisions <br />