Laserfiche WebLink
26 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> c <br /> C) <br /> m <br /> 0 <br /> that division comes at an elevation of 3881 on the reservoir <br /> gage, I think the allocation should be on this basis that the =' <br /> m'I <br /> reservoir capacity below that elevation be allocated to irriga- <br /> tion uses and the capacity above that elevation be allotted <br /> to flood control, and in our engineering studies we have assumed t <br /> 0 <br /> that the irrigation pool was filled at an elevation of 3881, <br /> and that quantities above that were flood water to be dealt <br /> with as flood spills. <br /> CRAIRMAP KRAMER: Thank you. The reason for ay question <br /> was to present to these gentlemen the specific thought and <br /> conclusion that has been reached by this Commission that a <br /> determinate, firm, fixed, inviolate separation between the <br /> ti;... oonseryation pool and the flood control pool be established <br /> plant of <br /> by a division at an elevation of 3851, and that is the <br /> request that this Commission wants to present to the Chief of <br /> Engineers . <br /> COLONEL RAMNIS: Kay I ask if you have in mind explaining <br /> a little bit about the difficulties that would result from <br /> establishing a firm quantity, such as 270,000 acre feet of <br /> water storage apace rather, to be reserved for flood control. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: That is , a firm quantity? <br /> COLONEL RANNIS: A firm quantity instead of elevation. <br /> MR. KNAPP: what I meant there was a firm original <br /> quantity, and that translated into an elevation and not a <br />