Laserfiche WebLink
220 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> any <br /> �► bung to do with them and don' t t wan t anything to do with <br /> them. I do not think <br /> You eta,►► take what we say as implying <br /> that. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: May I kind of attempt to crystal.. <br /> lice this discussion, and I think it has been very purpose < <br /> tub, and aeeees 0 <br /> sary? It seems to me it is entirely with the <br /> provinee of this Commission to state in Its ooapaot that it <br /> recognises its legal invapaoity to deal with the division of <br /> imported water between Colorado and Kansas; but that the pur- <br /> pose of the compact is not suoh as to preclude, orderly and <br /> properly, the development of additional water supplies in <br /> Colorado and the benefioial use thereof, and that suoh future <br /> developments ton be brought within the purview of the soapact <br /> by appropriate action of the signatory states. <br /> MR. MITCHELL: I think that is very well eaeprees ed. <br /> CHAIRMAN I MER; It reoognl rtes .both situation*, <br /> the inability legally to split iaported water to meet the <br /> recognition of the physioalities that may have to be faced in <br /> the next year or the next generation. <br /> MR. MITCHELL: That meets your thought, Charley. <br /> MR. PATTZR$ONt Except one points I spoke of <br /> possible future developments. I think there are also possible <br /> future developments In Kansas. <br /> MIL MI TCH E LL a All right. <br /> MR. PATTERSON: If you will include that, that is all <br /> right. <br />