Laserfiche WebLink
210 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> orittoisa it we went ahead and up something ihtoh they fTi <br /> interpret as being prohibitory to their works <br /> f 0 <br /> SITU 6 We can recognise that, I think, in <br /> appropriate language. <br /> 0 <br /> OW:RUN DAM, That is the trieh1 yes. < <br /> cn <br /> iR, 'MAW that will be said tous if Vs Oannet <br /> flit On whet we have and submit anything? Certainly, we can. <br /> not go on what we have not and what we might get, <br /> . <br /> MITCHELL* No, but we *an do this& We recognise <br /> that there slay be amisideraktioens in the future with which We <br /> are not vet authorised to deal. <br /> MS. VIDAL* That is why I suggested and I have al,p <br /> ways had in mind that we comet make any *compact that is not <br /> subject to stun! adjustment. An infinity of things may aeon <br /> and age. I know a situation where one of the largest sugar <br /> fadterles in the world was built in California on an Wig* <br /> which turned out uaexpeotwily to beooas oil acreage. The <br /> farmers would not grow beet* when they could get hundreds of <br /> dollars of revenue from oil.. <br /> we are here to do a job, I don't mean to say we <br /> ignore these things. After all, I take this point of views <br /> I an opposing it in my views and the views of the committee <br /> as to the legal aspect of the situation. It doesn't mean we <br /> cannot, in making the compactt, guard ourselves in such way as <br /> .1;i; I K two telllmg these ava3 ,Ic to n 'fie--vg bsv,cntt <br />