Laserfiche WebLink
75 <br /> m <br /> v <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> examination during the progress of the case, but that a man m <br /> 0 <br /> who was entirely new to this thing until about two months ago, <br /> Mr. Guy Vincent, in starting to study the net river gain in m; <br /> Colorado on a daily basis ran across that omission. So we <br /> 0 <br /> have to hand it to the engineers . <br /> MR. TIDAL: We didn't have much time for cross—examination <br /> in the case. We only spent ten years on it. <br /> ( Discussion off the record. ) <br /> MR. VIDAL: What , if any, consideration does your com- <br /> mittee expect to give to the matter you just mentioned, the <br /> report from the Secretary of the Interior, with the attached <br /> outline by the Bureau of Reclamation of certain factors that <br /> in their judgment ought to be considered, and the possibility <br /> that other agencies of the United States Government may also <br /> send in some statements as to their views of the situation, <br /> particularly with reference to this Bureau of Reclamation <br /> suggestion? Do you intend to study what effect they might <br /> have? Take, for instance, the 10,000 acre foot fish pool. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: May I attempt to answer your question <br /> for the Committee? The report of the Committee and its <br /> studies so far have taken no cognizance of the Secretary of <br /> ti.e Interior' s letter, inasmuch as that letter has not yet <br /> been acted upon by the Commission, and technically speaking <br /> is certainly not in the hands of the Committee for action <br /> at this juncture. I would like to mention this thought: <br />