Laserfiche WebLink
74 <br /> O <br /> 0 <br /> I want to make a confession that cost me a cigar to the <br /> crowd here that the Kansas engineers found an error in Colorado's -4 <br /> state line flow record. It grows out of the fact that the Z <br /> a <br /> flow at the state line has been conceived to consist of three <br /> D <br /> separate records, one being the flow of the Arkansas River at <br /> .Z7 <br /> holly, the second being the flow of Wild Horse Creek at Holly, <br /> and the third the flow of the Holly drain at or near the state �I <br /> line. The sum of these three values are treated as the flow <br /> at the state line. For some of the years of this record it <br /> was found upon careful check by the Kansas engineers that <br /> Wild Horse Creek water was not included in that total, and <br /> we have gone back over the history of the location of that <br /> station and have agreed that we made a mistake in the record <br /> from about 1922, I believe, to 1938, and since that time have <br /> agreed upon a revised and corrected record for the flow at <br /> the state line. <br /> ow, otherwise I think the records that were used in the <br /> Kansas suit are unchanged. We have added the four additional <br /> years for the :urpose of the study . <br /> Al. IPTLA ;D: The last record, then, would have a little <br /> more going into Kansas than what you show? <br /> 4R. PATTERSON: An average of about 2500 acre feet an- <br /> nually more water at the state line than the former figures <br /> would have shown for the same period. <br /> MR. KNAPP: I might add we didn't catch it in cross- <br />