My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Memorandum Agenda Item 15e 01/23,24/2002
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
Memorandum Agenda Item 15e 01/23,24/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2016 12:33:46 PM
Creation date
10/10/2014 3:11:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
1/23/2002
Description
Board Meeting Request for Comments on Whether the Anti-Speculation docttrine applies within the Dever Basin Aquifers of the Designated Basins
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br /> Colorado Water Conservation Board ; <br /> • Department of Natural Resources �° ���� �A <br /> 1313 Sherman Street,Room 721 " i <br /> Denver,Colorado 80203 � J <br /> Phone:(303)866-3441 <br /> FAX:(303)866-4474 '° <br /> www.cwcb.state.co.us <br /> Bill Owens <br /> Governor <br /> To: CWCB Members Greg E.Walcher <br /> Executive Director <br /> From: Rod Kuharich, Dan McAuliffe,Dan Merriman, Ted Kowalski Rod Kuharich <br /> CWCB Director <br /> Date: January 14, 2002 Dan McAuliffe <br /> Deputy Director <br /> Re: Agenda Item 15.e,January 23-24,2002 Board Meeting,Request for Comments on <br /> "Whether the Anti-Speculation doctrine applies within the Denver Basin Aquifers of <br /> the Designated Basins" <br /> In December, 2001, we received the attached memorandum from William Fronczak <br /> requesting comments about whether the anti-speculation doctrine applies within the Denver Basin <br /> aquifers of the Designated Basins. This issue is currently before a Designated Ground Water Judge. <br /> This case may be appealed to the Colorado Supreme Court, and eventually that ruling could have <br /> implications about the Denver Basin aquifers outside of the Designated Basins. Consequently, we <br /> • thought that you may want to have an opportunity to discuss issue. <br /> As you know, Senate Bill 5 (passed in 1985) provided that water in the Denver Basin <br /> aquifers would be allocated based on overlying land ownership. As such, it has been a widely held <br /> belief that the anti-speculation doctrine either does not apply in the Denver basin aquifers, or that if <br /> the anti-speculation doctrine applies, it is an easier standard to satisfy. The Colorado Supreme <br /> Court, arguably, called into question this logic when it held in the Chatfield East decision: <br /> A water right is a right of use. ...the general assembly and the courts of this state have often <br /> reinforced the policy of keeping the public water resource available to those who can and will <br /> use it beneficially, as opposed to those who wish to speculate in its value and price. Even <br /> though Denver Basin groundwater is managed differently from waters of the natural stream <br /> the Groundwater Management Act mirrors the anti-speculation, beneficial use, non-waste <br /> precepts of Colorado Law. <br /> While this language is almost certainly dicta, the issue not absolutely decided one way or the other. <br /> The Staff, and Hal Simpson, will be available to answer any questions and follow-up on the Board's <br /> decisions regarding this matter. <br /> Attachment <br /> S <br /> Flood Protection•Water Supply Planning and Finance•Stream and Lake Protection <br /> Water Supply Protection•Conservation and Drought Planning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.