My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Finance Committee Meeting 2006
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
Finance Committee Meeting 2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2015 3:48:30 PM
Creation date
8/18/2014 4:26:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/19/2006
Description
Finance Sub-Committee Meeting September 19, 2006
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Non-Reimbursable Application-CWCB Construction Fund <br /> Form Revised June 2006 <br /> 411 <br /> 3. Provide a brief description of your organization below: <br /> N/A <br /> 'art B.-Description of the Project or Study <br /> 1. Name of the study or project: Analysis of recreational and environmental uses, quantification <br /> methods, and effects of water rights on water management <br /> 2. What is the purpose of this grant application? Check one. <br /> x Study <br /> Demonstration project. <br /> :......... ._ <br /> Rehabilitation or <br /> replacement of existing <br /> • <br /> Other(Please describe) <br /> 3. General location of the study or demonstration project. (Please include county, and approximate distance <br /> and direction from the nearest town): <br /> Statewide study <br /> 4. Please provide a brief narrative description of the proposed study or demonstration project including <br /> purpose,need, and service area. (Attach scope of study, if available) <br /> Colorado has been at the forefront of the western states with regard to water rights for instream <br /> flow purposes since 1973 when the General Assembly authorized the CWCB to appropriate <br /> instream flow water rights. In addition, Colorado is the only State that allows local <br /> governmental entities to obtain water rights associated with instream structures for recreational <br /> purposes in(and on) the water. There has been disagreements over how much water is <br /> necessary for these purposes and the economic benefits of these water rights. Now after the <br /> instream flow statues has been in place for over 30 years, and the RICD statute has been in <br /> • <br /> place for over 5 years, it seems wise analyze: 1) how these water rights affect water <br /> management: 2) quantification methods: and 31 what are the true historic economic benefits. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.