Laserfiche WebLink
Financial Plan <br /> Northern Water intends to utilize the CWCB Water Project Loan Program for financing of the Granby <br /> Hydro construction. The loan would be entered into through Northern Water's existing Hydropower <br /> Enterprise. This Enterprise was created in 2011 for the Carter Hydro Project in order to obtain a loan <br /> from the Colorado Water Resources and Power Development Authority (CWRPDA). The Enterprise is <br /> presently funded solely by revenues from the Carter Hydro Power Purchase Agreement with Poudre <br /> Valley REA. CWRPDA provided a loan for$2,000,000 for Carter Hydro with the balance of <br /> $4,700,000 being a loan from Northern Water to the Hydropower Enterprise. The terms were 20 years <br /> repayment period at 2 percent interest. <br /> Since the financing of Carter Hydro, CWCB has developed a loan program as well at a rate of 2 percent. <br /> In order to make the project financially feasible, a 30-year term is necessary. At present, the CWRPDA <br /> will finance up to 20 years which results in a financially infeasible project. For this reason, Northern <br /> Water is requesting the full loan amount through CWCB. <br /> Cash Flow <br /> A summary of the project cash flows is provided in Table 3. The cash flows are based upon the <br /> following assumptions: <br /> • A 2 percent 30-year loan with the 1 percent origination fee and interest during construction <br /> rolled into the loan and the loan reserve built over the first 10 years in equal amounts. First <br /> payment would be due in the Fall of 2017. <br /> • Power Purchase Agreement with MPEI based upon the present Tri-State Generation and <br /> Transmission Policy 115 and 117 rate tables for the first ten years and Policy 115 year-10 rate <br /> frozen for the next 20 years (total of 30-year contract). These rate tables are attached. <br /> • MPEI capacity charge of$2 per kw per month. <br /> • Reclamation LOPP charge of 2 mills per kwhr escalating at 1.5 percent per year. <br /> • Operations and maintenance cost of$50,000 per year escalating at 1.5 percent per year. <br /> Two anticipated cash flows were evaluated. The first scenario entitled Planning Scenario is shown in <br /> Table 4 and provides a conservative approach to the project costs and revenues. This scenario was <br /> utilized in order to confirm that even under a slightly higher project cost and a lower amount of output, <br /> the project can break even. A conservative project construction cost of 5,250,000 was assumed for this <br /> scenario. The second scenario looks a more probable scenario with a slightly lower project cost and a <br /> higher project output and is shown in Table 5. A project cost of$5,000,000 was assumed for this <br /> scenario. The loan request is based upon the conservative Planning Scenario. <br /> 10 <br />