Laserfiche WebLink
§ 37- 92- 103(3)(a), C.R.S. (2008) (emphasis added). Once an <br />appropriation occurs, it gives rise to a vested water right <br />subject to permitting and adjudication. In re Concerning <br />Application for Water Rights of Turkey Canon Ranch LLC, 937 P.2d <br />739, 744 (Colo. 1997). Prior appropriated rights have priority <br />over subsequent junior rights. Empire Lodge Homeowners' Ass'n <br />v. Moyer, 39 P.3d 1139, 1148 -49 (Colo. 2001) (noting that <br />Colorado water law emphasizes the adjudication and <br />administration of decreed water rights in order of their <br />priority). <br />Consequently, we begin with the central question presented <br />by this case -- whether CBM production is a "beneficial use" <br />giving rise to an appropriative water right subject to water <br />well permitting, water court adjudication, and administration by <br />the Engineers. We find that it is. We then turn to the <br />Engineers' and BP's assertion that we must defer to the <br />Engineers' interpretation of the term "beneficial use" and <br />conclude that we need not defer. Finally, we consider, and <br />ultimately disagree with, the argument that the regulation of <br />CBM production is exclusively within the province of the COGCC. <br />A. <br />While the term "beneficial use" is undefined in the <br />Colorado Constitution, the 1969 Act defines it broadly as "the <br />use of that amount of water that is reasonable and appropriate <br />11 <br />