Laserfiche WebLink
Metropolitan Water Supply Investigation MWSI Process <br /> 2. Information Development (Phase II) - This phase was designed to <br /> inventory and gather relevant information and data and evaluate the <br /> analytical tools available for analysis of water supply options. In addition, <br /> this phase included the initial formulation, refinement and screening of <br /> targeted cooperative water supply opportunities. <br /> 3. Modeling (Phase III) - This study phase was to develop the analytical <br /> capability needed to evaluate the individual and combined yield potential <br /> and operational aspects of a variety of water supply options including the <br /> targeted opportunities. <br /> 4. Opportunities Evaluation(Phase IV) - This phase was to investigate the <br /> water supply options coming out of Phases II and III in terms of their yield <br /> and operational implications, facilities requirements and costs,potential <br /> environmental impacts and potential institutional issues. <br /> 2.2.1 . Phase I Scoping <br /> During the Scoping phase of the MWSI, it became apparent that most TAC members <br /> were uncomfortable with the process of cooperative planning involving numerous parties. <br /> It was felt that this tension came from a combination of factors including a history of <br /> competition among water providers for limited supply; suspicions about possible state <br /> "hidden agendas"in the MWSI; uncertainties about how to structure and conduct <br /> cooperative planning efforts that focused on existing systems; turf issues such as the need <br /> to protect existing supplies; and uncertainties about how the results of cooperative water <br /> supply planning would be used. <br /> Because of these factors, the TAC recommended that the MWSI emphasize the process, <br /> discussions and information gathering necessary to establish and improve working <br /> relationships, and not"target" specific water supply projects for study. This required an <br /> incremental approach that would allow TAC members to exchange"comfortable" levels <br /> of information about their respective water supply systems, identify and understand each <br /> others' issues and concerns, and evaluate cooperative planning opportunities on a gradual <br /> and incremental basis. Although this process would require more time than expected, it <br /> was expected to produce valuable working relationships and, accordingly,was judged to <br /> be a worthwhile investment. <br /> At a two day retreat held in April 1994, TAC members agreed that their primary mission <br /> would be to assist and guide state agencies and consultants in the selection and analysis <br /> of opportunities to achieve better coordination of existing water supply systems. The <br /> TAC also agreed to assist in communicating the status of the MWSI to Forum members <br /> and other interested parties and to serve as a clearinghouse for the exchange of <br /> information and ideas between its members, state agencies and the consultant team. <br /> During the retreat the TAC agreed that the MWSI should focus on four broad conceptual <br /> categories of water supply options: conjunctive use; effluent management; interruptible <br /> supply arrangements; and other systems integration opportunities. TAC work groups <br /> 6 <br /> Prepared for the Colorado Water Conservation Board,Colorado Department of Natural Resources by <br /> Hydrosphere Resource Consultants,1002 Walnut Street,Suite 200,Boulder,CO 80302 <br />