Laserfiche WebLink
Navajo-Gallup Water Supply Project <br /> The NEPA process began with publishing of a Notice of Intent in the Federal Register on <br /> March 27, 2000. Scoping meetings were held at five locations in April and May 2000: <br /> Crownpoint, Gallup, Shiprock, and Farmington,New Mexico and Saint Michaels, <br /> Arizona. The meetings were moderately attended, with a range of 15 to 50 people per <br /> meeting. The most common comments from these meetings were that there is a great <br /> need for a reliable M&I water supply throughout the proposed project area, that existing <br /> groundwater is in limited supply, and that the water is usually of poor quality. <br /> The Navajo and Jicarilla Apache Nations and the city of Gallup provided their current <br /> and projected populations and associated M&I water needs to year 2040. An estimated <br /> water use rate of 160 gallons per day per person was used for the proposed project design <br /> as requested by the Navajo and Jicarilla Apache Nations.' It was assumed that available <br /> groundwater would continue to be used and that project water would provide the <br /> remaining need. <br /> The Steering Committee identified possible alternatives to meet current and future water <br /> needs. It was determined in all past studies, as well as in this study, that the San Juan <br /> River was the only sustainable source of water. Therefore, all the viable alternatives <br /> involved treating river water for use throughout the proposed project area. <br /> Water conservation is currently well established in the proposed project area, and <br /> although additional conservation would reduce water use, it would not be enough to <br /> provide for future water needs. It is assumed that water conservation will continue with <br /> all project alternatives considered. Six physically different,viable alternatives were <br /> identified to bring San Juan River water to the proposed project area. These alternatives <br /> all would provide the same quantity of treated water to the same delivery locations. The <br /> variables included where the water would be diverted and the location of the alternatives' <br /> facilities. Maximizing the use of existing facilities and information were important <br /> factors in the design of the alternatives. All alternatives use Navajo Reservoir and <br /> Navajo Indian Irrigation Project(NIIP) facilities to some extent and have the same <br /> Gallup Regional System supplying water to the city of Gallup and surrounding Navajo <br /> chapters. <br /> Four of the alternatives obtain all of the water from Navajo Reservoir and the NIIP <br /> facilities: <br /> • NIIP Moncisco Alternative <br /> • NIIP Coury Lateral Alternative <br /> • NIIP Cutter Alternative <br /> • NIIP Amarillo Alternative <br /> The city of Gallup uses 160 gallons per capita per day(gpcd)for current and future demand <br /> projections. The Navajo Tribal Utility Authority's current average water use rate is 100 gpcd. <br /> S -4 <br /> I <br />