My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C153140 Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
4001-5000
>
C153140 Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2015 12:04:28 PM
Creation date
2/19/2014 3:49:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153140
Contractor Name
Fruita, Town of
Contract Type
Loan
County
Mesa
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The soils in the Grand Valley area were classified by the Soil <br /> Conservation Service in cooperation with the Colorado Agricultural Experi- <br /> ment Station in 1940. The results of that study in the Fruita area are <br /> shown in Figure I-4. The soil classification symbols, along with a general <br /> description of each symbol , are tabulated in Table I-1 <br /> The soils in the Fruita area are generally classified by the Soil <br /> Conservation Service as silty clay loams to sandy clay loams. The soils <br /> have developed by weathering and wind and water deposition. The parent <br /> material is usually the Mancos Shale which is a lake deposit of the <br /> Cretaceous age. These soils are generally poorly drained and are affected <br /> by local irrigation practices and surface drainage. The soils normally <br /> stand well and would not present any unusual construction problems , except <br /> where there is a high water table. Permeability rates are normally slow, <br /> and that factor, together with high water tables, has caused problems with <br /> several septic systems. <br /> The classification of soils within the Colorado National Monument, <br /> the Glade Park area, and Pinon Mesa have not been prevented within this <br /> report because construction in these areas is not anticipated by the pro- <br /> posed plan. <br /> I-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.