Laserfiche WebLink
N <br />Peter summarized the discussion about the inventory by pointing out that the <br />state liked helping TNC with funding because its classification scheme was <br />not tied to political issues. What product can the state get for our work <br />together? Nancy said that she would be prepared to address that question at <br />the next meeting and may bring someone from TNC actually doing the work. <br />Wetlands Workshops <br />Susan Foster pointed out that the original intent of the grant was to offer four <br />workshops, each one for a different audience: business, agriculture, local <br />government and legislators. The next thought was to offer workshops in <br />different areas of the state. This led to the current thinking that to offer <br />workshops associated with professional meetings throughout the state would <br />be a great way to engage excellent participation. She handed out a list of <br />conference dates, pointing out that all of these meetings, while targeting <br />important and large groups of people, do not reach the farming or the <br />business community. They do serve very well the cattlemen, local <br />government, city planners, and water users. She asked for suggestions about <br />how to reach the other groups. <br />Jerry Novak suggested that Susan contact Diane Rymers at the Home Builders <br />Association, as well as the Professional Engineers of Colorado who plan field <br />trips periodically. Brad Rock pointed out that the Colorado Farm Bureau has <br />an annual meeting in late July or early August. Terri said the Soil <br />Conservation district boards would be helpful. They meet once a month <br />locally. Brad added that wetlands are a big concern to farmers and that they <br />would likely turn out for a one -day meeting. We should document by slides <br />or video what has gone on in other workshops. The C.S.U. Cooperative <br />Extension might be helpful. If the workshops carried Continuing Legal <br />Education credit, we might draw some attorneys. <br />Peter asked how we intended to facilitate the information exchange intended <br />by the grant. Susan responded that this will have to be uniquely built into <br />each workshop setting. Jerry suggested that we should talk with George <br />Dibble at the Colorado Association for Commerce and Industry. They have a <br />"Fifty for Colorado" program for individuals becoming oriented to business <br />in the state. Perhaps we could do a workshop for that group. Steve <br />emphasized that the intent is to first get people into the field, leaving their <br />political baggage behind them, if possible. The field experience will be <br />scientific, but explained in layman's terms. He urged everyone to look at <br />Susan 's outline of the content areas to be addressed in the workshops to <br />better understand the intent. Kelly suggested that the word "values" be <br />substituted for "uses ". Mike said he liked the outline and that to videotape <br />the field trips would be a great way to summarize the different types of <br />wetlands visited and how people respond to them. Steve said that with our <br />budget, at least slides are feasible. Kelly encouraged the use of aerial photos <br />and maps so that participants can get a good sense of how the wetlands and <br />riparian areas are a part of a larger system. <br />Wetlands Resource Group Minutes, 2/2/93, Page 3 <br />