My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12000000053 McIntosh Dam Inundation Report
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
12000000053 McIntosh Dam Inundation Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2014 4:02:34 PM
Creation date
2/5/2014 3:58:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
12000000053
Contractor Name
Highland Ditch Company
Contract Type
Grant
Water District
5
County
Boulder
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2.2 Dam Breach Simulation in HEC-HMS <br /> The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE)hydrologic modeling computer program HEC-HMS <br /> was used to simulate a clear-day piping failure of McIntosh Dam using the breach parameters <br /> estimated by each of the empirical equations. As a conservative measure, the simulation which <br /> produced the greatest peak outflow was selected for use in the downstream hydraulic modeling and <br /> inundation mapping. <br /> For each HEC-HMS breach simulation the water surface was set at the spillway crest at the onset of <br /> the breach, and the reservoir was assumed to drain completely. The assumption was made that the <br /> breach would extend from the dam crest (elevation 5079.07) to a surveyed low spot near the <br /> downstream toe of the dam (elevation 5061.00),2 with breach side slopes of 0.7:1 (horizontal to <br /> vertical). As recommended in the Guidelines for Dam Breach Analysis, the piping failure was set to <br /> start at the midpoint of the final breach height. A storage-elevation table from the 1995 Hydrology <br /> Report for McIntosh Lake Dam by JR Engineering was used to model the reservoir storage. A copy <br /> of the storage-elevation table is attached in Appendix B. The time to peak and the peak outflow for <br /> each of the HEC-HMS simulations is summarized below in Table 2. <br /> Table 2. McIntosh Reservoir Dam Failure <br /> Comparison of HEC-HMS Piping Simulation Results <br /> Empirical Method Time to Peak Peak Outflow <br /> (minutes) (cfs) <br /> Froehlich 109 12,200 <br /> Von Thun and Gillette 102 10,900 <br /> USBR 8 5,800 <br /> Of the three methods that were analyzed, the Froehlich method resulted in the greatest predicted <br /> peak outflow of 12,200 cfs with a time to peak of 109 minutes. This hydrograph was routed <br /> downstream using HEC-HMS through representative reaches using the Muskingum-Cunge method. <br /> The reach descriptions, routing times, and predicted flow rates are summarized below in Table 3. <br /> The HEC-HMS output is attached in Appendix C, and the full HEC-HMS model is included on the <br /> Project CD. <br /> Table 3. McIntosh Reservoir Dam Failure <br /> Summary of HEC-HMS Results Downstream of McIntosh Dam <br /> Location Estimated Time from Start of Estimated Peak Flow <br /> Breach Development Rate(cfs) <br /> Peak outflow at breach 1 hr 49 min 12,200 <br /> Airport Rd. 2 hr 0 min 11,900 <br /> Hover St. 3 hr 17 min 10,900 <br /> Hwy 287(Main St.) 4 hr 29 min 10,100 <br /> Hwy 119 in Boulder Co. 5 hr 34 min 9,300 <br /> Hwy 119 in Weld Co. 9 hr 33 min 6,200 <br /> 1-25 12 hr 57 min 4,800 <br /> 2 Elevations are in NAVD 88. <br /> MCINTOSH DAM - 2 - June 15,2012 <br /> INUNDATION MAPPING REPORT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.