Laserfiche WebLink
1.0 INTRODUCTION <br /> Deere&Ault Consultants, Inc. (D&A)has prepared this Inundation Mapping Report at the request <br /> of the Highland Ditch Company. This report documents the procedure of modeling a clear-day dam <br /> breach of McIntosh Dam, and the development of the resulting inundation maps downstream of the <br /> dam. The inundation maps will be used to update the existing Emergency Action Plan(EAP) and to <br /> assist those involved with emergency preparedness planning and response. The hydraulic models <br /> and inundation maps contained in this report were prepared using the NAVD 88 vertical datum. The <br /> report and all associated models have been prepared in accordance with the regulations and <br /> guidelines set forth by the Colorado Department of Natural Resources, Office of the State Engineer <br /> (SEO). <br /> 1.1 Location and Background <br /> McIntosh Reservoir is located at the northwestern edge of Longmont, Colorado in Section 30 of <br /> Township 3 North, Range 69 West of the 6th Principal Meridian. McIntosh Dam is classified as a <br /> Small Significant Hazard Dam, per the Rules and Regulations for Dam Safety and Dam <br /> Construction of the State of Colorado. It is an earthen compacted dam with a height of 17 feet and a <br /> normal storage of approximately 2,460 acre-feet. <br /> 2.0 DAM BREACH ANALYSIS <br /> 2.1 Breach Parameter Estimation <br /> McIntosh Dam was visually inspected on-site and with aerial photographs, and a ground survey was <br /> conducted by D&A to determine the spillway crest elevation and the dimensions of the dam at the <br /> maximum section. <br /> Three empirical methods for predicting the average breach width and failure time were compared. <br /> The methods, which are included in Appendix A, are the Froehlich (2008) equations, the Von Thun <br /> and Gillette (1990) equations, and the USBR(1988) equations (collectively referred to as the <br /> "empirical equations").1 The empirical equations predict the average breach width and failure time <br /> as a function of depth of water, dam height, and volume of water stored. A comparison of the <br /> breach parameters calculated by each of the empirical equations is shown below in Table 1. <br /> Table 1. McIntosh Reservoir Dam Failure <br /> Comparison of Dam Breach Parameters <br /> Empirical Method Average Breach Width Time of Failure <br /> (feet) (minutes) <br /> Froehlich 114 109 <br /> Von Thun and Gillette 95 102 <br /> USBR 42 8 <br /> A fourth empirical method known as the MacDonald&Langridge-Monopolis/Washington State(2007) <br /> method was not considered based on recommendations found in the Guidelines for Dam Breach Analysis. <br /> MCINTOSH DAM - 1 - June 15,2012 <br /> INUNDATION MAPPING REPORT <br />