Laserfiche WebLink
1-, <br />November 19, 2012 <br />Ed Warner <br />2764 Compass Dr. Ste. 106 <br />Grand Junction, CO 81506 <br />Re: Potential Annexation of Lake Nighthorse by the City of Durango <br />Dear Mr. Warner: <br />Thank you for meeting with representatives of the San Juan Water <br />Commission and our legal counsel last week in Farmington. It was a good start <br />to the consultation process that is needed with the Commission as a contractor to <br />the ALP Project. As we discussed, we have serious concerns about the <br />proposed annexation of Lake Nighthorse by the City of Durango. <br />The main concern is that City annexation could hamper the operations of <br />the reservoir as a drinking water supply, its primary use. For example, if City <br />regulations and ordinances apply, they could dictate the methods the ALP OM &R <br />Association (the "Association ") uses to control weeds, as we discussed. One <br />potential way to ameliorate this problem would be to incorporate into the City's <br />agreement for Lake Nighthorse the federal exemption language that appears in <br />the draft annexation agreement between Durango and the Animas -La Plata <br />Water Conservancy District. That provision, found at Section II.A.4 of the draft <br />that Barry Longwell provided on November 5, 2012, states that Reclamation, "in <br />its sole discretion, [can] make reasonable safety and security decisions <br />associated with its operation of the Animas -La Plata Pump Station" despite City <br />ordinances or other terms in the annexation agreement. This is the sort of <br />protection that the Association would need for the Commission to consider <br />agreement with the idea of annexation. <br />A similar concern of the Commission is that because demand for water <br />from the reservoir may take many years to develop, recreation interests could <br />become so entrenched that they try to stop drawing down the reservoir to a very <br />low level if needed to supply drinking water in times of drought. It is possible that <br />drawing down the reservoir to a low level could impair recreation, but if it's <br />needed to provide water to the Commission and others, the loss of recreation <br />cannot be used to stop such a drawdown. Consequently, any annexation <br />agreement with the City must contain significant protection for the Association to <br />use the reservoir as it was intended, no matter what the recreation <br />consequences might be. Having seen similar conflicts in New Mexico, we are <br />