Laserfiche WebLink
than by release from Ridges Basin Reservoir) absent a decree for an additional alternate point <br />of diversion for A -LP water under the A -LP Decrees. <br />The A -LP Project Compact, entered in 1963 between the State of Colorado and the State <br />of New Mexico, provides that "The right to store and divert water in Colorado and New Mexico <br />from the La Plata and Animas River systems ... for uses in New Mexico under the Animas -La <br />Plata Federal Reclamation Project shall be valid and of equal priority with those rights granted <br />by decree of the Colorado state courts for the uses of water in Colorado for that project...." § <br />37 -64 -101, C.R.S. (2011). Non - stored Allocations for the New Mexico <br />Proiect uses therefore may also be accounted for in the Animas River at the DPP instead of <br />being pumped to Ridges Basin Reservoir, a.k.a. Lake Nighthorse. °^rI ;;m ; #m^ FnedeliRg ^f the <br />PFejeet is the _20-0-0- FSEIS, FefeFeReed by GengFess on the 200-0-AMPRdmeRts, included the <br />deliveFy ^f aR aveFage of 35 efs *9f. PFejeetwateF tO the avaj^ Natien and SjWE. At any time <br />there is Storable Flow at the DPP, up to r.,,^. they ^ al f eyo rate e s to be ,diseussedl of <br />additional flow¢ may be accounted for under the A -LP Decrees as a Non - stored Allocation for <br />these New Mexico Participants. The total "Project Flow Rate" will be capped at the DPP <br />capacity plus the-se M ^ + "'•, ^ seaWRal fl^•_• ratte eap&4-Gq New <br />Mexico Non - stored Allocations. As noted above, this limitation is based on the Engineer's <br />current interpretation of the existing decrees and other documents related to project water use <br />and may be modified in the future. <br />As plans for the remaining Project Participants' uses of A -LP water continue to develop, <br />such as other Proiect Participants havine the ability to take delivery of their portions of Proiect <br />water supply by direct ALP diversions, the Engineers will consider any remaining questions <br />concerning the administration of Nonstored Allocations with interested parties. So long as the <br />Stored and Non - Stored Allocations are properly accounted for and diversions are properly <br />identified, there is no prohibition on the use of water as a Non - Stored Allocation by any project <br />water user. <br />All Non - stored Allocations are subject to the Teft Limitations. In order to ensure that <br />deliveries of Non - stored Allocations do not result in injury to other water rights and can be <br />properly accounted for, the administrative process will need to include: (1) the A -LP OM &R <br />Association will identify a need for A -LP water, on behalf of one or more Project Participants; <br />(2) the water available in priority at Teft will be measured; (3) the amount that is available in <br />priority at Teft and identified for delivery for direct use will then be accounted for at the DPP <br />It i <br />days .,.,.-yea I� __ 7_ - .f/day, .days de d by 1.98 aue feet PeF efs equals 35 efs ) <br />§ An average continuous diversion of 37.1 cfs for a year would provide the full combined average annual supply of <br />Project water for New Mexico users . (26,828 acre feet of diversion per year divided by 365 days per year equals <br />73.5 of /day, divided by 1.98 acre feet per cfs equals 37.1 cfs.) <br />0 <br />