Laserfiche WebLink
form &AC -02A <br />W/F <br />AMENDMENT #2 <br />Comanche <br />FEASIBILITY <br />Peterson <br />Lakes <br />REPORT <br />ET <br />Twin <br />CONTRA <br />^ARTMENT OR AGENCY NAMB <br />ater Conservation Bd. <br />DEPARTMENT OR AOENCY NUMBER <br />PDA <br />ROUTINo NUMBER <br />No additional encumbrance <br />199 .2 by and between the State of Colorado for <br />ibis day o[ <br />.n,S CONi'�GT. maw S <br />greuseandbenefto(dwDePa�eetof Natural Resoure <br />(Colorado Water Conservation Board) <br />the City of Greeley, <br />and referred go the <br />Center, Greeley, CO 80631, <br />Greeley <br />factor f Contractor. <br />bereln[ter referred to as the made available and a <br />been budgeted, appropriated and otherwise <br />lr is in <br />the I,sw and Funds Gave ro riatioa 2y ' <br />gt;gVAS, authority cads hk for Payment in lrund Number 4�. P <br />tl1tf remarns evade dumber; C -15 3 4 6 7 <br />sufficient unencumbered balanoa WTRC Contract Me mbMace <br />p,� "tion YYYY i'rogram a m rule agencies; and <br />u'rted aQpr � clearance and coordination have been aeeompWhed (ram and with PP P <br />WIIBR�' l 1986, Contract <br />WHEREAS, a contract was <br />Original <br />State Contract), between the <br />cheered into on July , <br />Encumbrance ndthe contractor; and <br />' al Contract provided that the state Would conduct <br />WHEREAS, the Origin Contractor namely, <br />Percent (50�) of the cost for t three dams; <br />pay fifty p Fi fty Percent (50 %) <br />feasibility studies for the re <br />Dollars <br />Comanche Dam, Peterson Dam and Twin Lt Hun r_..Y <br />l;ontract; and <br />of that cost is Sixty -Eight Thousala = Or].tg. <br />Exhibit B h <br />as shown by �` r' anal <br />($68,560), , t to the Orig. <br />1988, an�m�� <br />WHEREAS, on February 17, a' and the Contractor <br />ndred Forty Dollars <br />Contract was entered -Six °Thousand Comanche Dam feasibility <br />which removed Twenty the <br />26,640), the proportionate share Ei ht_ Thousand - Five- Hundred- <br />($ from the original Sixtyriation for the three <br />study only, state app P <br />Sixty-Dollar ($68,560) <br />feasibility studies; and <br />17, 1988, a Project Contract was entered <br />WHEREAS, <br />on February he Contractor for the rehabilitation of <br />into between the Snd thenTwenty- Six - Thousand- Six- HundrstudyrW was <br />the Comanche Dam <br />cost of the Comanche Dam feasibility <br />Dollar ($26► ) <br />added to that contract; and <br />now wishes to add contract <br />remove Amendment #2 <br />WHEREAS, The Contractor Dollars <br />to the Original Contract wousandesixaHu dred Forty on Dam feasibility <br />a Twenty-Three Thousand the Peter <br />additional the proportionate share of and <br />($23,640), original Contract; <br />study only, from the Orig� <br />contractor now desires to enehaba.litation °ofct <br />WHEREAS, the Contra proceed with the r <br />Contract with the State to p <br />Peterson Dam; and the i!wentY-Three Tnausa� "' <br />WHEREAS, the Contractor wisnes ado from the Original <br />pro Peterson Dam <br />Six Hundred Forty Dollars ($23� 640) deleted the p <br />Contract to the repayment schedule for r <br />rehabilitation Project Contract, <br />_,_5, Fifty-sixth General <br />ellaoted into law, the State <br />WHEREAS; pursuant to Senate Bill No y. to loan a sum <br />r of the State of Colorado, ect Contract 380,000) for <br />Assembly Three <br />Hundred Eighty Thousand Dollars ($ <br />has been authoriz to enter into a Pro h includes Twenty- hate <br />not to exceed Three whit <br />Dollars ($23,640) as the States s <br />the rehabiix HundredfFortyrSOri Dollar Dam, which <br />Dam, as shown in Exhibit B <br />Thousand six report for Peter <br />of the feasibility rep <br />of the Original Contract; and <br />bj291.k <br />4 dallcon <br />Page 1 of �� <br />CWCO8/9, EXHIBIT B <br />i <br />