Laserfiche WebLink
Organization <br />The paper is organized by sections on 1) a <br />conceptual perspective; 2) a progression of <br />study options; 3) a review of study options; <br />and 4) integration, trade -offs, and inserting <br />findings into decision - making processes. <br />The document also provides a series of <br />"sidebars" interspersed through the text. <br />These short discussions of related topics <br />are identified by a box outline. Separate <br />sidebars are provided on: <br />• Hydropower licensing and recreation <br />• Flow regimes, long -term effects, <br />and recreation <br />• Flows and aesthetics <br />• Problems with "blind" flow studies <br />• Flows, fish habitat, and fishability <br />• Roles and responsibilities <br />during fieldwork <br />• Study needs for new license <br />applications <br />Photos illustrating key concepts or study <br />findings are also interspersed throughout <br />the report. Highlighting central ideas <br />from the document, these photos and <br />captions also convey the breadth and <br />depth of flow - recreation studies or the <br />issues they have addressed. <br />"Controlled flow studies" are a powerful tool, allowing <br />resesarchers and recreation users to evaluate a range <br />of flows over a short period of time. These studies <br />are common for relicensingprojects that have bypass <br />reaches. Different study options provide different levels <br />of resolution about flow effects on recreation; this guide <br />helps river professionals recognize the "right tool for <br />the job': <br />Left: Pit 3 Dam releases 1,800 cfs on California's Pit <br />River; this bypass reach has historically provided base <br />flows about 150 cfs. <br />Flows and Recreation: 3 <br />A Guide for River Professionals <br />