My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Estimating Additional Water Yield From Changes in Management of National Forests in the North Platte Basin
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Estimating Additional Water Yield From Changes in Management of National Forests in the North Platte Basin
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2013 2:57:42 PM
Creation date
3/6/2013 10:50:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
An Independent Report Prepared for the Platte River EIS Office U.S. Department of the Interior Related to Platte River Endangered Species Partnership (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP),
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
North Platte
Water Division
6
Date
5/12/2000
Author
Charles A. Troendle, Matcom Corporation & James M. Nankervis, Blue Mountain Consultants
Title
Estimating Additional Water Yield from Changes in Management of Ntional Forests in the North Platte Bains, Final Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The balance of the conifer stands suitable for timber harvest were managed <br />as uneven aged. Again, the management is on a 120 -year rotation using <br />partial cutting or individual and group selection as the harvesting method. <br />The intention is to enter each sawtimber stand on a 30 -year entry cycle, <br />reducing the stand basal area to about 80 ft2 acre - ' at each entry. Depending <br />on the species, initial stand density varies up to 150 ft acre -'. Each year <br />1:30''' of the total area is thinned. <br />Spruce -Fir is the second most prevalent forest cover type in the North Platte <br />drainage, occupying about 25 percent of NFS land or 124,281 acres. ' <br />Approximately 4,143 acres of spruce -fir were thinned in 2001 with no <br />change in flow simulated. After 5 years, a total of 20,714 acres were <br />harvested and water yield increased from 15.7 to 16.0 inches. After 15 <br />years, 62,142 acres were harvested and flow increased to - 16.6 inches. In <br />total, the 0.9 inch increase in flow generated 9321 acre -feet of additional <br />water per year. We expect the long -term sustainable increase over the 120- <br />year rotation will average 14,000 acre -feet of water per year. This <br />represents a sizable increase from the 124,281 acres of spruce -fir forest. <br />Ponderosa pine occupies 14,179 acres of the Suitable for Timber Harvest ' <br />area. Ponderosa pine was also partially or selectively harvested and reduced <br />to a basal area of 80 ft2 acre'. In the year 2001, 473 acres were partially cut <br />with not impact on the base line water yield of 1.2 inches. By year 2005, <br />2363 acres of ponderosa pine were harvested with no simulated change in <br />flow. Although minor increases in flow might be expected, precipitation <br />was so limiting in this forest type that an increase in flow from timber <br />harvest was not simulated. ,. <br />Limber pine occupies only 118 acres of suitable area and hydrologic <br />simulation indicated we could increase water yield from current yield of 8.6 <br />inches in year 2000 to 9.5 inches in year 2015. Unfortunately, because of <br />limited area, this equates to an increase in total yield of less than 10 acre - <br />feet. , <br />Douglas fir occupies only 764 acres of the Suitable for Timber Harvest area. , <br />Like limber pine, the area is too limited to generate much of a change. After <br />15 years of partial cutting, water yield increased from 12.0 inches to 12.6 <br />inches and represents an increase of 38 acre -feet of water per year. Base <br />water yield for douglas fir as presented in table 11 is much higher than the <br />average water yield presented in table 8 for current conditions. This is a I <br />40 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.