Laserfiche WebLink
currently being generated. Simulation of harvesting 1:120th of the area in the <br />year 2001 does not indicate any change in flow (rounding error) occurs. By <br />the end of year 2005, when 5:120ths are harvested, total flow would increase <br />to 11.4 inches (or a 0.3 inch increase in water yield from the entire over <br />355,354 acres of lodgepole pine). By 2015, when 15:120th of the area would <br />be harvested, simulated flow increased to 12.0 inches reflecting a 0.9 inch <br />increase over the 15 -year period. This equates to an increase of 26,651 acre - <br />feet of water per year in year 2015. It would be at this point in time that as <br />we proceed in the harvesting alternative we would also begin to simulate a <br />decrease in flow or hydrologic recovery from the area harvested in 2001. <br />The hydrologic recovery period can be expected to take a total of 60 to 70 <br />years (Troendle and King 1987), so the efficiency of additional cutting in <br />subsequent years beyond 2015 would continue to exceed declines due to re- <br />growth in earlier harvest areas, for many years; perhaps 50-years. Increases <br />in flow should eventually reach and sustain 40,000 acre -feet of water per <br />year from lodgepole pine throughout the rotation. It would be possible to <br />accelerate the harvesting and generate greater water yields at least in the <br />near term, because over 50 percent of the lodgepole cover type., is in <br />sawtimber class. However, an accelerated production rate now would not be <br />sustainable either in terms of timber production or water yield over the long <br />term. <br />Like lodgepole pine, aspen is also best managed using even aged <br />management and like lodgepole pine, clear cutting on a 120 -year rotation <br />was the silvicultural tool simulated. There are currently 7,278 acres of aspen <br />considered suitable for timber harvest. WRENSS simulations indicate 13.3 <br />inches of water is being generated from that cover type at present. Clear <br />cutting 1:120th of the area (61 acres) did not alter flow in year 2001. By year <br />2005, 303 acres had been harvested yielding a 0.4 inch increase in flow. By <br />year 2015, 915 acres had been harvested, yielding an additional 1.2 inches of <br />water for a total increase in yield of 725 acre -feet of water per year. <br />Depending on site quality and initial stocking (sprouting) density, aspen can <br />recover hydrologically in anywhere from 15 to 45 years. This estimate is <br />based on unpublished simulations of growth response, using GENGYM <br />(Edminster 1978) and assuming complete hydrologic recovery occurs at a <br />leaf area index of 5.25 (Troendle and Leaf 1980). If we assume an average <br />30 -year recovery; the increase in flow from aspen can be sustained at about <br />1000 acre -feet per year over the 120 -year rotation. <br />39 <br />