Laserfiche WebLink
River. The review should identify where certainties conclusions are drawn and <br />uncertainties exist. Where, the reliability of those conclusions should be <br />identified. Issues to be addressed should include: <br />• Quality, reliability, sensitivity, or confidence relative to data <br />identified in Task 1. <br />• Factors (and their significance) that influence channel width, <br />sediment supply, sediment transport, and vegetative encroachment <br />in and along the central Platte River. <br />• Macro - historic (hundreds to thousands of years) natural variability <br />of channel width, sediment supply, sediment transport, and <br />vegetative encroachment, and/or macro - historic natural variability <br />of the factors that influence channel width, sediment supply, flow <br />conditions, sediment transport, and vegetative encroachment; <br />including a comparison of how current status and trends compare <br />to natural variability. <br />• Status of channel width, sediment supply, sediment transport, and <br />vegetative encroachment, and/or status of the factors that influence <br />channel width, sediment supply, sediment transport, and vegetative <br />encroachment, prior to settlement and development of the Platte <br />River Basin. <br />Changes in channel width, sediment supply, sediment transport, <br />and vegetative encroachment, and changes in the factors that <br />influence channel width, sediment supply, flow conditions, <br />sediment transport, and vegetative encroachment since settlement <br />and development; including data that supports or refutes those <br />changes. <br />Potential geomorphologic or vegetative consequences, if any, of <br />the Proposed Program as it is currently formulated, and the <br />likelihood of those consequences (included likely amount of time <br />necessary for such consequences to develop). <br />Potential geomorphologic or vegetative consequences of adding <br />sediment (including in any quantity and manner proposed in the <br />EIS Team products) under current flow conditions and under flow <br />conditions of the Proposed Program (this evaluation may require <br />assessing any potential impacts below Chapman). <br />It is permissible, for each of the above issues, for the Consultant to conclude that <br />existing information supports specific conclusions or a range of conclusions. It is <br />also appropriate for the Consultant to conclude that insufficient information <br />currently exists to support a conclusion on any of the above issues. <br />Task 4. Develop Framework for Further Addressing SedNe Issues <br />The Consultant should identify and describe potential future work tasks that could <br />be undertaken to improve our understanding of channel narrowing or deepening, <br />