My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume II Appendix K, Part 1
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume II Appendix K, Part 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2013 3:47:00 PM
Creation date
2/27/2013 1:09:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
related to the Platte River Endangered Species Partnership (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP)
State
NE
Basin
North Platte
Date
7/1/1998
Author
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Office of Hydropower Licensing
Title
Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) - Volume II, Appendix K, Part 1 - Kingsley Dam (FERC Project No. 1417) and North Platte/Keystone Dam (FERC Project No. 1835) Projects, Nebraska, FERC/FEIS-0063
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
551
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CEN -2 <br />N <br />COMMENTS OF CENTRAL NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER AND <br />IRRIGATION DISTRICT <br />depletions in the basin,121 the Districts' share would be <br />114 of the basin's enhancements.& <br />Each of these analyses allocates responsibility based <br />on some measure of impact on flows. Many other components <br />of the development of the basin also affect the available <br />acreage of various habitat types without affecting flows. <br />They include: agricultural draining of wetlands; bridges <br />and other shoreline construction, including Interstate -80; <br />and bank stabilization programs. Clearly, the role of the <br />Projects in changing the Platte River Basin, and in <br />maintaining it in its present state, is relatively small. <br />FERC Staff must take care in this proceeding not to burden <br />the Projects and their beneficiaries with a disproportionate <br />share of "restoration" or "enhancement" measures. No matter <br />how the Districts' share is calculated, approximately 10 -154 <br />of the goals for the basin (whether land -based or water - <br />related enhancements) is the most these Districts should be <br />asked to achieve. <br />L1 In oral communications, DOI preliminarily has <br />suggested that the Projects are responsible for 330,000 <br />acre -feet of a 3,000,000 acre -feet depletion total. Central <br />believes DOI's methodology serves to overestimate both total <br />depletions and depletions by individual entities on the <br />Platte River by inadequately accounting for the return of <br />diverted water to the river through returns, drains and as <br />river gain and run -off. This returned water is counted a <br />second, third or fourth time as a depletion when diverted <br />for reuse. <br />L' <br />,fig infra section II.A.1. for a more detailed <br />discussion of DOI's approach. <br />- 10 - <br />RESPONSES TO CENTRAL NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER AND <br />IRRIGATION DISTRICT <br />CEN -2 The Commission must equally consider developmental and <br />nondevelopmental values in its determination of the public interest within <br />the guidelines established by the Federal Power Act. It is the <br />Commission's practice in relicensing to consider all aspects of the public <br />interest, including the project(s)' potential to improve existing conditions in <br />light of present day societal values, taking into consideration the various <br />purposes (developmental and nondevelopmental) potentially served by the <br />project(s). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.