My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
The Feasibility of Operational Cloud Seeding in the North Platte River Basin Headwaters to increase Mountain Snowfall
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
The Feasibility of Operational Cloud Seeding in the North Platte River Basin Headwaters to increase Mountain Snowfall
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2013 4:20:28 PM
Creation date
2/25/2013 4:12:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
related to the Platte River Endangered Species Partnership (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP)
State
WY
CO
Basin
North Platte
Water Division
6
Date
5/1/2000
Author
Jonnie G. Medina, Technical Service Center, Water Resources Services, River Stystems and Meteorology, Denver, CO
Title
The feasibility of Operational Cloud Seeding in the North Platte River Basin Headwaters to Increase Mountain Snowfall
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
t <br />' projects. The idea is that using cloud seeding to increase snowfall on a mountain barrier, for example, <br />leaves less moisture for downstream areas. Some downstream water users become concerned that <br />upwind seeding projects may be "robbing" some of their water. This issue will need to be considered in <br />the design phase and some provision made for dealing with it in the operational seeding phase and <br />possibly the design phase. The extended area effects item is discussed in more detail in appendix A, <br />chapter 10. <br />' The extended area effects issue has received attention in a number of studies. Dennis (1980) reviewed <br />several projects and indicated extended area effects were tentative at best. Assessment of these effects <br />poses a major challenge given that detecting precipitation changes in intended target areas has itself <br />proven to be a formidable task. Generally, previous studies of extended area effects suggest tentative <br />effects, if any (appendix A, chapter 10). From a statistical detection standpoint, very small changes are <br />' usually not detectable in the sample sizes of most experiments. In the proposed study, detection will face <br />the same hurdles unless effects are well larger than previously thought, an unlikely possibility. If the <br />primary cloud seeding mode is propane release, the issue of reactivation of AgI (and therefore possibly <br />affecting precipitation) well downstream will not surface. Operational seeding requires that the target <br />area be seeded in all potential cases, subject to suspension criteria. This operational mode eliminates <br />extended area effects control cases. Solutions may include the monitoring of a large, currently - installed <br />' network of precipitation gauges and /or large radar - estimated, precipitation grid. Again, only large <br />changes would be detectable in such a monitoring system. The extended area effects issue will need to be <br />addressed in the operational phase evaluation plan. Extended effects in the design phase seeding are not <br />anticipated because of limited seeding for small target areas. <br />1 <br />1 <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.