My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
The Feasibility of Operational Cloud Seeding in the North Platte River Basin Headwaters to increase Mountain Snowfall
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
The Feasibility of Operational Cloud Seeding in the North Platte River Basin Headwaters to increase Mountain Snowfall
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2013 4:20:28 PM
Creation date
2/25/2013 4:12:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
related to the Platte River Endangered Species Partnership (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP)
State
WY
CO
Basin
North Platte
Water Division
6
Date
5/1/2000
Author
Jonnie G. Medina, Technical Service Center, Water Resources Services, River Stystems and Meteorology, Denver, CO
Title
The feasibility of Operational Cloud Seeding in the North Platte River Basin Headwaters to Increase Mountain Snowfall
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />I G5. Additional precipitation caused by cloud seeding occurs in amounts that are detectable in <br />the intended targeted areas when compared to control amounts. <br />' The seeding hypotheses resulting from the design phase are expected to be largely based on the static <br />seeding mode. However, the modeling results of Orville et al. (1987) suggested that seeding layer clouds <br />may cause embedded convection under some atmospheric conditions, leading to enhanced liquid water <br />production. Because dynamic effects may sometimes occur by presumed static seeding, observations in <br />the Headwaters Region must be viewed in light of possible dynamic effects under favorable atmospheric <br />conditions. <br />The field measurements necessary to deal with seeding hypotheses G1 -G5 include some or all of the <br />following. <br />M1. Assess SLW over the mountain barrier with radiometers and /or icing rate meters. <br />1 <br />J <br />1 <br />1 <br />M2. Measure propane gas dispenser flow rate and nozzle temperature. Measure AgI <br />generator solution flow rate and flame temperature. Automatically telemeter <br />measurements via radio to a central monitoring site. <br />M3. Measure ambient temperature, humidity and winds at seeding device locations and at <br />other selected locations of the mountain barriers. Telemeter measurements via radio to <br />the central monitoring site. <br />M4. Estimate transport and diffusion of the seeding created ice particles with mobile <br />detectors mounted on a four -wheel drive vehicle, at the Storm Peak Laboratory, and <br />possibly one other fixed location in the Medicine Bow Mountains. Measuring devices <br />may include 2D probes, ice nucleus counters, tracer gas detectors, and a cloud droplet <br />measuring device (FSSP). Other equipment may include (optional) scanning Doppler <br />radar for assessing winds to and from the radar and precipitation, and a radar profiler to <br />monitor the vertical distribution of horizontal winds and virtual temperature. <br />M5. Measure precipitation with high resolution gauges with specifications to resolve to within <br />five minutes and 0.1 millimeters of water equivalent. Gauge spacing will be determined <br />during the project design phase. <br />11 <br />G1. There exists SLW in excess of that naturally converted to snowfall when the prevailing <br />wind produces a positive component normal to the mountain barrier. <br />G2. Cloud seeding devices (propane gas or AgI) reliably lead to the creation of ice particles in <br />an environment favorable to the survival of ice, while in transport to cloud volume <br />containing SLW. <br />G3. Seeding creates ice crystals in numbers, estimated by models and limited measurements, to <br />be adequate in concentration, that turbulence and /or convection lead to transport and <br />' <br />diffusion throughout a substantial portion of the targeted SLW zone. <br />G4. Favorable environments exist and growth time is adequate during transport such that ice <br />' <br />particles can grow large enough to reach the intended target area before <br />evaporation /sublimation occurs in the lee -side airflow. <br />I G5. Additional precipitation caused by cloud seeding occurs in amounts that are detectable in <br />the intended targeted areas when compared to control amounts. <br />' The seeding hypotheses resulting from the design phase are expected to be largely based on the static <br />seeding mode. However, the modeling results of Orville et al. (1987) suggested that seeding layer clouds <br />may cause embedded convection under some atmospheric conditions, leading to enhanced liquid water <br />production. Because dynamic effects may sometimes occur by presumed static seeding, observations in <br />the Headwaters Region must be viewed in light of possible dynamic effects under favorable atmospheric <br />conditions. <br />The field measurements necessary to deal with seeding hypotheses G1 -G5 include some or all of the <br />following. <br />M1. Assess SLW over the mountain barrier with radiometers and /or icing rate meters. <br />1 <br />J <br />1 <br />1 <br />M2. Measure propane gas dispenser flow rate and nozzle temperature. Measure AgI <br />generator solution flow rate and flame temperature. Automatically telemeter <br />measurements via radio to a central monitoring site. <br />M3. Measure ambient temperature, humidity and winds at seeding device locations and at <br />other selected locations of the mountain barriers. Telemeter measurements via radio to <br />the central monitoring site. <br />M4. Estimate transport and diffusion of the seeding created ice particles with mobile <br />detectors mounted on a four -wheel drive vehicle, at the Storm Peak Laboratory, and <br />possibly one other fixed location in the Medicine Bow Mountains. Measuring devices <br />may include 2D probes, ice nucleus counters, tracer gas detectors, and a cloud droplet <br />measuring device (FSSP). Other equipment may include (optional) scanning Doppler <br />radar for assessing winds to and from the radar and precipitation, and a radar profiler to <br />monitor the vertical distribution of horizontal winds and virtual temperature. <br />M5. Measure precipitation with high resolution gauges with specifications to resolve to within <br />five minutes and 0.1 millimeters of water equivalent. Gauge spacing will be determined <br />during the project design phase. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.