Laserfiche WebLink
Table 3. 1, continued. Published road surface erosion rates in the original units and converted to kilograms per square <br />meter per year. <br />Reference <br />Location <br />Traffic, slope <br />Erosion Rate <br />Reported <br />Sed. Product. <br />(kg m-2 yr) <br />Blong and Humphreys (1982) <br />Papua, New <br />Guinea <br />70.0 mm/yr <br />100 <br />Megahan et al. (1983) <br />Idaho <br />11 mm/yr <br />16 <br />Riley (1988) <br />New South Wales, <br />Australia <br />2.4 -3.9 mm/yr <br />3.6 -5.8 <br />Fahey and Coker (1989, 1992) <br />Smith and Fenton (1993) <br />New Zealand <br />Unvegetated, granite <br />5.2 -15 <br />Megahan et al. (2001) <br />Idaho <br />Cover density 0.1 -89% <br />55 -104% gradient <br />0.1 -247.6 t/ha yr <br />0.01 -25 <br />Filsslopes <br />Bethlahmy & Kidd (1966) <br />Idaho <br />Unvegetated fillslope <br />94 t/ha 10.5 mo <br />11 <br />Megahan (1978) <br />Idaho <br />12 yr old fillslope <br />12 t/ha yr <br />1.2 <br />Fahey and Coker (1989, 1992) <br />Smith and Fenton (1993) <br />New Zealand <br />55% gradient, variable <br />cover density <br />0.1 -1.2 <br />the stream channels. Many older roads are located imme- <br />diately adjacent to stream channels or other water bod- <br />ies, and this increases the likelihood that road runoff and <br />erosion will reach the stream channels. Roads impinging <br />on streams can also increase bed and bank erosion by re- <br />ducing channel sinuosity (Schumm, 1971). Newer road <br />designs include vegetative filter strips, more frequent <br />drainage, outsloping of the road surface to disperse road <br />runoff, and narrower road surfaces to reduce the size of <br />the road tread, cutslopes and fillslopes. Whenever pos- <br />sible, roads are being placed in upslope or ridgetop posi- <br />tions rather than in the valley bottom, and this should <br />substantially reduce the potential for adverse effects. <br />3.3. Stream Temperature <br />Disturbance or removal of the streamside vegetation will <br />generally increase the amount of direct solar radiation <br />reaching the surface waters and potentially increase wa- <br />ter temperatures. Higher water temperatures will directly <br />affect aquatic life, while an important indirect effect of <br />higher water temperatures is the decreased solubility of <br />dissolved oxygen. Surprisingly few recent studies have <br />been published on the effects of forest management <br />practices on water temperature (Beschta et al., 1987; <br />Binkley and Brown, 1993a; Swank and Johnson, 1994). <br />To the best of our knowledge, there are no published data <br />from Colorado assessing stream temperature changes in <br />response to forest management. <br />The dominant mechanism for stream temperature in- <br />creases is the increased exposure of small streams to di- <br />rect solar radiation. Other potential mechanisms include <br />increased air temperatures, channel widening, soil water <br />temperature increases, and streamflow modifications <br />(Ice, in press). Small streams with lower flow rates and <br />shallower flow depths are more susceptible to heating, <br />but they also recover more rapidly (Andrus and Froe- <br />hlich, 1991; Ice, in press). Maintaining streamside shade <br />by retaining some or all of the streamside vegetation can <br />minimize stream temperature increases. The experimen- <br />tal harvests at Coon Creek and Fraser Experimental For- <br />est generally did not expose the channel to direct solar <br />radiation, so the temperature changes induced by forest <br />harvest are expected to be negligible (C. Troendle, Mat - <br />com Corp., pers. comm., 2003). <br />P <br />Most aquatic organisms have optimal temperature <br />ranges and temperature increases of more than 2 °C may <br />alter development rates of aquatic organisms. An in- <br />crease in sunlight and a corresponding increase in water <br />temperatures will increase primary productivity and the <br />growth rates of aquatic organisms. In colder high- eleva- <br />tion streams, an increase in stream temperature might be <br />considered beneficial in terms of increasing productivity, <br />particularly if the stream is used for recreational fish- <br />ing. A comparable increase in stream temperatures in a <br />lower - elevation stream might be considered detrimental, <br />and this indicates the importance of defining the loca- <br />