My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Forests and Water: A State of the Art Review for Colorado
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
Forests and Water: A State of the Art Review for Colorado
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2013 10:31:34 AM
Creation date
2/22/2013 2:33:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2003
Title
Forests and Water: A State-of-the-Art Review for Colorado
Author
Colorado State University
Description
Colorado State University 2003
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Table 3. 1, continued. Published road surface erosion rates in the original units and converted to kilograms per square <br />meter per year. <br />Reference <br />Location <br />Traffic, slope <br />Erosion Rate <br />Reported <br />Sed. Product. <br />(kg m-2 yr) <br />Blong and Humphreys (1982) <br />Papua, New <br />Guinea <br />70.0 mm/yr <br />100 <br />Megahan et al. (1983) <br />Idaho <br />11 mm/yr <br />16 <br />Riley (1988) <br />New South Wales, <br />Australia <br />2.4 -3.9 mm/yr <br />3.6 -5.8 <br />Fahey and Coker (1989, 1992) <br />Smith and Fenton (1993) <br />New Zealand <br />Unvegetated, granite <br />5.2 -15 <br />Megahan et al. (2001) <br />Idaho <br />Cover density 0.1 -89% <br />55 -104% gradient <br />0.1 -247.6 t/ha yr <br />0.01 -25 <br />Filsslopes <br />Bethlahmy & Kidd (1966) <br />Idaho <br />Unvegetated fillslope <br />94 t/ha 10.5 mo <br />11 <br />Megahan (1978) <br />Idaho <br />12 yr old fillslope <br />12 t/ha yr <br />1.2 <br />Fahey and Coker (1989, 1992) <br />Smith and Fenton (1993) <br />New Zealand <br />55% gradient, variable <br />cover density <br />0.1 -1.2 <br />the stream channels. Many older roads are located imme- <br />diately adjacent to stream channels or other water bod- <br />ies, and this increases the likelihood that road runoff and <br />erosion will reach the stream channels. Roads impinging <br />on streams can also increase bed and bank erosion by re- <br />ducing channel sinuosity (Schumm, 1971). Newer road <br />designs include vegetative filter strips, more frequent <br />drainage, outsloping of the road surface to disperse road <br />runoff, and narrower road surfaces to reduce the size of <br />the road tread, cutslopes and fillslopes. Whenever pos- <br />sible, roads are being placed in upslope or ridgetop posi- <br />tions rather than in the valley bottom, and this should <br />substantially reduce the potential for adverse effects. <br />3.3. Stream Temperature <br />Disturbance or removal of the streamside vegetation will <br />generally increase the amount of direct solar radiation <br />reaching the surface waters and potentially increase wa- <br />ter temperatures. Higher water temperatures will directly <br />affect aquatic life, while an important indirect effect of <br />higher water temperatures is the decreased solubility of <br />dissolved oxygen. Surprisingly few recent studies have <br />been published on the effects of forest management <br />practices on water temperature (Beschta et al., 1987; <br />Binkley and Brown, 1993a; Swank and Johnson, 1994). <br />To the best of our knowledge, there are no published data <br />from Colorado assessing stream temperature changes in <br />response to forest management. <br />The dominant mechanism for stream temperature in- <br />creases is the increased exposure of small streams to di- <br />rect solar radiation. Other potential mechanisms include <br />increased air temperatures, channel widening, soil water <br />temperature increases, and streamflow modifications <br />(Ice, in press). Small streams with lower flow rates and <br />shallower flow depths are more susceptible to heating, <br />but they also recover more rapidly (Andrus and Froe- <br />hlich, 1991; Ice, in press). Maintaining streamside shade <br />by retaining some or all of the streamside vegetation can <br />minimize stream temperature increases. The experimen- <br />tal harvests at Coon Creek and Fraser Experimental For- <br />est generally did not expose the channel to direct solar <br />radiation, so the temperature changes induced by forest <br />harvest are expected to be negligible (C. Troendle, Mat - <br />com Corp., pers. comm., 2003). <br />P <br />Most aquatic organisms have optimal temperature <br />ranges and temperature increases of more than 2 °C may <br />alter development rates of aquatic organisms. An in- <br />crease in sunlight and a corresponding increase in water <br />temperatures will increase primary productivity and the <br />growth rates of aquatic organisms. In colder high- eleva- <br />tion streams, an increase in stream temperature might be <br />considered beneficial in terms of increasing productivity, <br />particularly if the stream is used for recreational fish- <br />ing. A comparable increase in stream temperatures in a <br />lower - elevation stream might be considered detrimental, <br />and this indicates the importance of defining the loca- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.