Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 3 <br />Effects of Forest Management Activities <br />and Fire on Water Quality <br />3.1. Introduction <br />Water from forested watersheds is typically higher in <br />quality than waters draining from any other major land <br />use (USEPA, 1980). The natural nutrient cycling and <br />streamflow generation processes in forested areas typi- <br />cally result in water that is low in nutrient and suspended <br />sediment concentrations. Forested watersheds are often <br />the source of public drinking water supplies, and this <br />is particularly true in Colorado due to the higher water <br />yields from forested areas (Chapter 2) as well as the high <br />quality of the runoff. <br />The potential effects of forest management activities <br />on water quality are often of greater concern than the <br />changes in runoff. Numerous studies have shown that <br />forest management activities may alter the physical <br />and chemical characteristics of runoff. Parameters of <br />particular concern include turbidity, total suspended <br />solids, temperature, and nutrients. Forest management <br />also can affect the amount and transport of larger -sized <br />particles (bedload). Changes in these parameters can af- <br />fect the beneficial uses of water and aquatic ecosystems <br />(MacDonald et al., 1991). A change in the chemical <br />and physical characteristics of water, especially when <br />the water is being used for domestic purposes, may <br />necessitate changes in water treatment and purifica- <br />tion. Increases in other parameters, such as temperature <br />or bedload, may be of less concern for drinking water <br />providers, but may be of greater concern for fisheries <br />or other aquatic resources. Large increases in sediment <br />loads will accelerate the rate of reservoir sedimentation <br />and can initiate a series of changes in channel morphol- <br />ogy through channel widening, or increase the likelihood <br />of flooding, which in turn can adversely affect people <br />and aquatic resources. <br />There is an extensive literature on the effects of forest <br />management on water quality, but only limited informa- <br />tion from Colorado. A review of the literature indicates <br />considerable variability with respect to the effects of for- <br />est management on water quality. This can be attributed <br />to differences in the type and location of management <br />activities as well as site - specific differences in runoff <br />and erosion processes. This chapter will review the po- <br />tential effects of forest management activities and fire <br />on erosion and sedimentation, stream temperature, and <br />21 <br />nutrients. It should be recognized that other activities in <br />forested watersheds, such as urbanization, water diver- <br />sions, gravel mining, and hardrock mining, may have <br />a greater effect on water quality and aquatic resources <br />than forest management. Because these other activities <br />represent a change in land use rather than forest manage- <br />ment, they fall outside the scope of this report and will <br />not be discussed here. The effects on water quality of <br />other types of forest disturbance, such as insects and dis- <br />ease, are not well documented, but the likely effects can <br />be extrapolated from the principles and data presented in <br />this chapter. <br />3.2. Erosion and Sedimentation <br />Soil erosion is defined as the detachment and move- <br />ment of soil particles. The site characteristics that have <br />the greatest effect on erosion rates include the amount <br />and type of precipitation, vegetative cover, soil texture, <br />and slope (Renfro, 1975; Falletti, 1977; Renard et al., <br />1997). Undisturbed forested watersheds typically have <br />very low erosion rates because of the high infiltration <br />rates and limited surface runoff (Binkley and Brown, <br />1993a, 1993b). Erosion rates have been estimated as less <br />than 0.1 tons per acre per year for most forested areas in <br />the interior western U.S. (Patric et al., 1984). Similar or <br />lower values have been documented for different forest <br />types in Colorado (Leaf, 1970; Gary, 1975) and for pon- <br />derosa pine -mixed conifer forests in northern Arizona <br />(Brown et al., 1974). Average long -term erosion rates <br />can be substantially higher where gullying, debris flows, <br />or other types of mass movements are important erosion <br />processes (Gary, 1975; Bovis, 1978). Undisturbed for- <br />ested areas in Colorado typically have very low erosion <br />rates because much of the precipitation falls as snow, <br />infiltration rates are high, and mass movements are ei- <br />ther infrequent or relatively inactive. In the lower- and <br />mid- elevation forests extreme rainstorms can generate <br />much higher sediment yields. Sediment yields of up to <br />6 tons per acre were recorded from a small, minimally- <br />disturbed ponderosa pine watershed in northern Arizona <br />that was subjected to a 100 -year rainstorm (Brown et al., <br />1974). <br />Site or soil disturbance by forest management activities <br />will generally increase soil erosion. Greater site distur- <br />bance is usually associated with a greater increase in <br />