Laserfiche WebLink
C L A S S I F I E D LEADS NOTDEAD <br />NEED USED pressure filter 1/4 -1 MGD or more. <br />Contact: George Talbottm YMCA - Longmont <br />303 - 485 -4865 <br />162 - 5/8x3/4 Badger water meters, 12-1 " Badger water me- <br />ters, and 3- 11/2" Badger water meters for sale for $600.00. <br />All meters are used and in good condition. Contact Willie Lay- <br />ton at 719 - 775 -855, the Town of Limon. <br />Wanted: Totalizing Flow Meters, used 2,4,6 and 8 each <br />Phone 303 - 261 -9440 <br />Peerless Pump - 50 H.P. Marathon Motor. In line unit with <br />control panel - Brand new, still on packing crate. 2 -15 H.P. <br />Marathon Peerless Pump - In line unit with control panel. <br />Contact: Town of Grand Lake - Bill Hagemann. Phone 970- <br />627 -3936 or 970 - 627 -3435. Fax 970 - 627 -9290. <br />New Berkley Centrifugal Pump <br />Model: B1 - 1/2 TPMS, B.M. #858088 <br />10 H.P. 208 - 230/460 volt, 3 phase, Frame #213JM <br />Contact: Norman Noe, South Swink Water <br />719 - 384 -6747 evening <br />719 - 469 -5031 daytime <br />BILLINGS, GILLETTE <br />MONTANA WYOMING <br />800.735.4489 866.686.7175 ; <br />CASPER <br />WYOMING MONTANA <br />888.235.0515 877.472.0711 <br />COLLEGE STATION, RAPID CITY, <br />TEXAS SOUTH DAKOTA <br />888.690.2218 888.672.1225 <br />ELKO, NEVADA <br />Satellite Location <br />775.750.0956 ; G <br />��tCELL,�rw,_ <br />� m <br />1Z 4 H <br />N <br />www.energylab.com <br />We offer UPS Authorized Return Service (ARS) for <br />convenient, low cost sample shipping. <br />By JerryBiberstine <br />You remember that pesky lead rule. The one actually called <br />the Lead and Copper By- Products Rule. Remember the fun <br />you had implementing it? Finding enough homeowners that <br />would take tap samples at 6 in the morning? Checking that the <br />samples were taken with the proper flushing procedure, and <br />overnight standing time? Calculating the 90th percentile, and <br />matching it up with the Action Levels, to find out if you were <br />in compliance, or not? Going to corrosion control, or replacing <br />lead service lines? <br />We thought the issue was pretty much put to rest. Systems <br />that had problems had dealt with them. Sampling was show- <br />ing that systems were in compliance with the Action Levels. We <br />were even considering asking EPA to back off on the sampling <br />requirements, in light of all the new requirements that are com- <br />ing. Well get ready. The fun is about to start all over again, and <br />as usual it is D.C. that is pushing the issue. <br />In August of 2002,Washington, D.C.went out of compliance <br />with the lead and copper action levels. Their chosen course of <br />action was do some corrosion control and to begin replacing <br />lead service lines. From here the problem only gets worse. The <br />public notification was not properly done,taps were apparently <br />not being monitored properly,and the treatment plants decided <br />to change to chloramines for disinfection. No one thought to <br />check on the effects of the treatment changes on the corrosivity <br />of the water in the distribution system. High levels were being <br />found everywhere. <br />The District, under pressure from EPA started doing more <br />sampling. So far,at least 157 homes have been found with levels <br />over 300 ppb. The Action Level is 15 ppb. There are so many <br />buildings with lead pipes, lead service lines, and complicated <br />services, that it was found that after flushing for the standard <br />one minute, the lead levels were still going up. <br />Keep in mind that high lead levels cause a multitude of <br />health related issues, including loss of IQ, hypertension, etc. <br />Personally, I always felt that lead levels in D.C. were one of the <br />reasons Congress often acts the way it does. Now, Congress is <br />taking EPA to task over the lead issue in the District's drinking <br />water. But, as usual, they don't want to address the problem, <br />which is D.C:s non - compliance. Theywant EPA to overhaul the <br />entire Lead and Copper By- Products Rule. And, of course, they <br />have suggestions on what the rule needs to be, regardless of the <br />consequences on the utilities or the customers they serve. <br />Here are a few of the "suggestions" that Congress has put <br />into a letter to EPA Administrator Benjamin Grumbles,with the <br />final recommendation that "EPA should reopen the rule to ad- <br />dress these issues <br />1. An enforceable MCL for lead and copper, instead of the 90th <br />percentile Action Level. <br />2. Houses found to exceed the Action Level must be supplied, <br />(continued on page 18) <br />17 <br />