Laserfiche WebLink
GROUNDWATER RESIDENCE TIME AND RECHARGE TEMPERATURE ESTIMATES OF THE DENVER AND ARAPAHOE AQUIFERS, DENVER BASIN, COLORADO <br />12- <br />10 <br />8 <br />U <br />0 <br />d <br />Y 6- <br />ca <br />a) 4 - - - -- - -- -- <br />F- <br />2- <br />0 <br />0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 <br />Time [ka] <br />Figure 2. Recharge temperature of groundwater samples (solid <br />squares) and uncertainty (error bars), Denver and Arapahoe <br />aquifers, Denver Basin, Colorado, and glacial and Holocene tem- <br />perature estimates (dashed lines) reconstructed from mean annual <br />modern temperature (solid diamond) and glacial temperature <br />depression of 5.5 °C. <br />Samples from wells farther toward the center of the basin, <br />regardless of aquifer, have apparent residence times of <br />22,000- 24,000 years. The sample from The Pinery (PIN -02) <br />showed an estimated residence time of greater than 30,000 <br />years, but there were some problems associated with the <br />analysis of this sample. In a qualitative sense, the apparent <br />residence times are what would be expected, with the <br />younger water toward the outcrops (recharge area) and <br />the older waters in the middle of the basin. <br />Estimated Paleotemperatures <br />The estimated temperatures at the time of recharge are <br />shown in Table 4. They range from 2.5 to 9.8 °C. The x2 <br />values of all samples were below or very near 3.84, the <br />level of 95% probability for the model. These results sug- <br />gest that the mean elevations used are reasonable, that the <br />excess -air component of the samples is not fractionated, <br />and the estimated recharge temperatures are reasonable. <br />The uncertainty in derived recharge temperature resulting <br />from the level of instrument precision was calculated as <br />0.9 °C (Manning and Solomon, 2003). Recalculating <br />recharge temperature with minimum and maximum eleva- <br />tions was used to estimate uncertainty in recharge temper- <br />ature resulting from the assumption of recharge elevation <br />(Table 2). The sum of these was used to approximate the <br />total uncertainty in recharge temperature in this study. <br />Recharge temperatures and uncertainties were plotted <br />with estimates of modern and glacial temperatures (Fig. 2). <br />The sample from Donala (DON -04) is very close to the <br />modern temperature in the recharge area as would be pre- <br />dicted by a residence time that is younger than the end of <br />the last glacial period. The recharge temperatures of the <br />other samples are all lower than the modern temperature. <br />The residence times and lower recharge temperatures of <br />these samples suggest these were recharged during the last <br />glacial period. Samples PARK -01 and AUR -07 have <br />recharge temperatures that are significantly greater than <br />the estimated glacial temperature. This could reflect signifi- <br />cant temperature fluctuations within the glacial period, <br />mixing of Holocene groundwater and /or the dilution of <br />14C activity that makes the groundwater appear `old.' The <br />latter explanation suggests that residence times could be as <br />young as the end of the last glacial period, approximately <br />12 ka in Colorado. While confined conditions are observed <br />Table 3. <br />Laboratory analysis results and field measurements of groundwater conditions; 14C reported in percent modern carbon (pmQ; <br />relative 13C/12C reported as delta 13- carbon per mil VPDB (813C %o); total dissolved gas pressure (PTDG). <br />165 The Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists <br />Relative Gas Concentrations <br />DIC <br />Field <br />Measurements <br />28N2 <br />3202 <br />40Ar <br />84Kr <br />20Ne <br />3He <br />4He <br />14C <br />813C <br />T <br />PTDG <br />Sample <br />Aquifer <br />100 <br />10-4 <br />10.2 <br />10-7 <br />10-5 <br />10-11 <br />10-4 <br />[pmC] <br />[ %o] <br />1,C] <br />[atm] <br />DON -04 <br />Arapahoe <br />0.95 <br />5.38 <br />1.05 <br />6.98 <br />2.05 <br />0.89 <br />0.16 <br />33.3 <br />-13.6 <br />15.5 <br />0.908 <br />PIN -02 <br />Arapahoe <br />0.99 <br />0.55 <br />1.15 <br />8.49 <br />1.52 <br />2.92 <br />1.53 <br /><2.27 <br />-12.7 <br />22.4 <br />1.119 <br />PARK -01 <br />Arapahoe <br />0.97 <br />192.01 <br />1.08 <br />8.00 <br />1.72 <br />3.19 <br />1.11 <br />4.59 <br />-13.0 <br />28.7 <br />1.155 <br />AUR -08 <br />Arapahoe <br />1.00 <br />3.55 <br />1.14 <br />8.44 <br />0.97 <br />5.13 <br />2.33 <br />5.60 <br />-10.8 <br />30.2 <br />1.122 <br />PARK -03 <br />Denver <br />0.99 <br />0.27 <br />1.07 <br />7.69 <br />1.57 <br />1.65 <br />5.13 <br />4.57 <br />-13.2 <br />29.7 <br />1.050 <br />AUR -07 <br />Denver <br />0.86 <br />3.46 <br />0.95 <br />6.67 <br />0.86 <br />0.83 <br />2.71 <br />5.00 <br />-9.7 <br />17.9 <br />1.012 <br />165 The Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists <br />