Milos M. Novotny and William E. Sanford
<br />Table 1.
<br />Location and physical characteristics of wells sampled; data in meters above mean sea level (MSL).
<br />Table 2.
<br />Land surface elevation of southern recharge zones (meters above MSL) used in model of atmospheric noble gases.
<br />Standard Coefficient
<br />Aquifer Mean Maximum Minimum Deviation of Variation
<br />Denver 2,084 2,250 1,861 112 0.05
<br />Arapahoe 1,994 2,100 1,814 81 0.04
<br />Model of Recharge Temperature
<br />Aeschbach -Hertig et al. (1999) have created a model
<br />that takes into account the effects of temperature, eleva-
<br />tion, salinity, and excess -air fractionation on atmospheric
<br />noble gas concentrations. Measured values of Ne, Ar, Kr,
<br />and Xe are used in the model to minimize an objective
<br />function, essentially producing a statistical measure of the
<br />"goodness -of -fit" of the data to the model. Novotny (2004)
<br />provides a more detailed discussion of the application of
<br />this model in the Denver Basin.
<br />Salinity of recharging water often cannot be measured
<br />and is assumed equal to zero; other researchers using simi-
<br />lar methodology have assumed that this parameter is negli-
<br />gible in waters with low salinity (e.g., Clark et al., 1998).
<br />The assumption appears valid in this study area where
<br />modern recharging water is closely tied to precipitation
<br />and no significant sources of salinity exist. Concentrations
<br />of two of the measured inert gases (helium and nitrogen)
<br />were not used because it is suspected that there are signifi-
<br />cant sources or modifications of these in the subsurface.
<br />The mean elevations of the Arapahoe and Denver aquifer
<br />recharge areas were estimated from digital elevation maps
<br />to be approximately 2,000 and 2,075 in above MSL, respec-
<br />tively (Table 2). With three known noble gas concentra-
<br />tions (Ne, Ar, Kr) and two unknown parameters (recharge
<br />The Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists 164
<br />temperature and excess air), the model equations are over -
<br />determined and may be inverted. A statistical fit of the data
<br />to the model is given by the objective function, x2. For the
<br />equation with one degree of freedom, and having a x2
<br />value of 3.84, the probability that the unknown parameters
<br />deviate from their true values because of errors in gas con-
<br />centration analysis is less than 5 %.
<br />RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
<br />The results of the noble gas and 14C analyses are pre-
<br />sented in Table 3• As expected, the majority of the gas
<br />content is dissolved nitrogen. The 14C activity is highest in
<br />the well located nearest the recharge areas and is lowest in
<br />samples from the middle of the Basin.
<br />Residence Times
<br />Applying the assumptions and techniques outlined
<br />above, the activity of 14C was used to determine the
<br />apparent residence time of the waters at each location
<br />(Table 3). The shortest residence time of 8,000 years was at
<br />Donala (DON -04) in the Arapahoe aquifer, the location
<br />nearest the outcrops and the highest potentiometric level.
<br />Screen Interval
<br />Surface
<br />Top
<br />Bottom
<br />CO -DWR
<br />PLSS Location
<br />Datum
<br />Depth
<br />Depth
<br />Sample
<br />Aquifer
<br />Permit
<br />T.R.S.Q.Q
<br />[m]
<br />[m]
<br />[m]
<br />DON -04
<br />Arapahoe
<br />16141 -F
<br />11S.66W.31.NW.SW
<br />2,103
<br />243
<br />359
<br />PIN -02
<br />Arapahoe
<br />51782 -F
<br />07S.65W.18.SE.NW
<br />1,948
<br />538
<br />657
<br />PARK -01
<br />Arapahoe
<br />50563 -F
<br />06S.66W.15.NE.SW
<br />1,787
<br />396
<br />518
<br />AUR -08
<br />Arapahoe
<br />30326 -F
<br />05S.65W.21.SE.NE
<br />1,829
<br />378
<br />512
<br />PARK -03
<br />Denver
<br />50562 -F
<br />06S.66W.15.NE.NW
<br />1,787
<br />235
<br />372
<br />AUR -07
<br />Denver
<br />30323 -F
<br />05S.65W.21.SW.NE
<br />1,829
<br />121
<br />351
<br />Table 2.
<br />Land surface elevation of southern recharge zones (meters above MSL) used in model of atmospheric noble gases.
<br />Standard Coefficient
<br />Aquifer Mean Maximum Minimum Deviation of Variation
<br />Denver 2,084 2,250 1,861 112 0.05
<br />Arapahoe 1,994 2,100 1,814 81 0.04
<br />Model of Recharge Temperature
<br />Aeschbach -Hertig et al. (1999) have created a model
<br />that takes into account the effects of temperature, eleva-
<br />tion, salinity, and excess -air fractionation on atmospheric
<br />noble gas concentrations. Measured values of Ne, Ar, Kr,
<br />and Xe are used in the model to minimize an objective
<br />function, essentially producing a statistical measure of the
<br />"goodness -of -fit" of the data to the model. Novotny (2004)
<br />provides a more detailed discussion of the application of
<br />this model in the Denver Basin.
<br />Salinity of recharging water often cannot be measured
<br />and is assumed equal to zero; other researchers using simi-
<br />lar methodology have assumed that this parameter is negli-
<br />gible in waters with low salinity (e.g., Clark et al., 1998).
<br />The assumption appears valid in this study area where
<br />modern recharging water is closely tied to precipitation
<br />and no significant sources of salinity exist. Concentrations
<br />of two of the measured inert gases (helium and nitrogen)
<br />were not used because it is suspected that there are signifi-
<br />cant sources or modifications of these in the subsurface.
<br />The mean elevations of the Arapahoe and Denver aquifer
<br />recharge areas were estimated from digital elevation maps
<br />to be approximately 2,000 and 2,075 in above MSL, respec-
<br />tively (Table 2). With three known noble gas concentra-
<br />tions (Ne, Ar, Kr) and two unknown parameters (recharge
<br />The Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists 164
<br />temperature and excess air), the model equations are over -
<br />determined and may be inverted. A statistical fit of the data
<br />to the model is given by the objective function, x2. For the
<br />equation with one degree of freedom, and having a x2
<br />value of 3.84, the probability that the unknown parameters
<br />deviate from their true values because of errors in gas con-
<br />centration analysis is less than 5 %.
<br />RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
<br />The results of the noble gas and 14C analyses are pre-
<br />sented in Table 3• As expected, the majority of the gas
<br />content is dissolved nitrogen. The 14C activity is highest in
<br />the well located nearest the recharge areas and is lowest in
<br />samples from the middle of the Basin.
<br />Residence Times
<br />Applying the assumptions and techniques outlined
<br />above, the activity of 14C was used to determine the
<br />apparent residence time of the waters at each location
<br />(Table 3). The shortest residence time of 8,000 years was at
<br />Donala (DON -04) in the Arapahoe aquifer, the location
<br />nearest the outcrops and the highest potentiometric level.
<br />
|