My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Citizen's Guide to Colorado's Environmental Era
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
Citizen's Guide to Colorado's Environmental Era
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2013 12:38:46 PM
Creation date
2/13/2013 3:19:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2005
Title
Citizen's Guide to Colorado's Environmental Era
Author
Colorado Foundation for Water Education
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
that 83 miles of the Poudre be designated <br />as either wild or recreational. This included <br />most of the mainstem of the river from its <br />source in Rocky Mountain National Park <br />to the canyon mouth along with the South <br />Fork of the river near Fort Collins. <br />The report received a mixed reaction. <br />Support came from the environmental com- <br />munity; opposition came from the water <br />management community that wanted further <br />study of potential reservoir sites. The Colorado <br />Mountain Club, Audubon Society and a newly <br />formed local group, Preserve <br />Our Poudre, all wrote letters in <br />support of the draft proposal. <br />The water management com- <br />munity talked of possible court <br />action. Its concerns centered on <br />the potential for the Wild and <br />Scenic designation to preclude <br />any and all storage sites from <br />future development. <br />One of the Poudre's old- <br />est and most well established <br />irrigation companies, the <br />Water Supply and Storage <br />Company, responded to the <br />USFS, "...the study seems <br />superficial and the recom- <br />mendations totally contrary <br />to the best interests of the <br />people of the state." The <br />Northern Colorado Water <br />Conservancy District <br />(NCWCD) asked the USFS to <br />defer a decision on 30 miles <br />of the proposed designation <br />until after a basin -wide water <br />resource development study <br />could be completed. <br />Taking these comments into consid- <br />eration, the USFS studied five alternative <br />designation combinations as it prepared <br />to issue a final Environmental Impact <br />Statement. Its final recommendation, <br />issued in 1983, included 62 miles for <br />designation, or 21 miles less than the <br />draft report had proposed. The USFS had <br />listened to water management input and <br />excluded the proposed Idylwilde, Rockwell <br />and Grey Mountain reservoir sites from its <br />final recommendation. <br />Idylwilde was a mainstem reservoir to be <br />located upstream of the confluence with the <br />South Fork. Grey Mountain was a mainstem <br />reservoir proposed in the lower 7.5 miles of <br />the canyon. The Rockwell site on the South <br />Fork was to be a joint effort between the <br />cities of Greeley and Fort Collins. <br />After the USFS recommendation, <br />Colorado Governor Dick Lamm surprised <br />many when he came out in favor of des- <br />ignating the entire upper Poudre, 12 miles <br />more than the USFS proposal. <br />With battle lines drawn, a Wild and <br />Scenic designation was no sure thing. Into <br />the fray stepped newly elected Congressman <br />Hank Brown. A well- respected former state <br />legislator from Greeley, Brown was familiar <br />with the Poudre and knew most of the key <br />interests on a personal basis. To those who he <br />was a stranger, he soon made acquaintances. <br />held out. Brown brought a smaller citizen's <br />group together with the task of crafting <br />a bill that would pass Congress. With <br />Brown's guidance and forceful personality, <br />the group eventually negotiated a compro- <br />mise acceptable to all parties. <br />This compromise would have desig- <br />nated 70 miles of the river as Wild or Scenic <br />and exempted from designation and permit <br />review a couple of possible storage projects <br />as long as fish bypasses were made. It also <br />included protective language exempting <br />present water development <br />from impacts associated with <br />Wild or Scenic designation. <br />However, Brown's first <br />attempt failed after national <br />environmental groups object- <br />ed. The bill never made it out <br />of committee. Yet Brown per- <br />severed, once again asking a <br />small local group to help write <br />the legislation. After months <br />of negotiations, the group <br />forwarded its compromise <br />bill to Congressman Brown. <br />It proposed designating 75 <br />miles of the Poudre as Wild or <br />Scenic, leaving undesignated <br />the lower 7.5 miles above the <br />canyon mouth. <br />Water managers gave <br />up reservoir sites upstream <br />at Idylwilde and Indian <br />Meadows, rendering <br />those projects unbuild- <br />able. Environmentalists <br />agreed that a reservoir site <br />below Poudre Park and the <br />Rockwell site on the South Fork would <br />be left undesignated and open to possible <br />future development. <br />Brown spoke eloquently before the <br />House Subcommittee on Interior and Insular <br />Affairs about the Poudre's treasures and that <br />it stood to become Colorado's first Wild and <br />Scenic River. He added that the bill reflected <br />the joint recommendations of the region's <br />conservation and water supply interests. <br />Brown must have been convincing. <br />President Ronald Reagan signed Public <br />Law 99 -590 making the Cache la Poudre <br />Colorado's first Wild and Scenic River in <br />October 1986. Northern Colorado water <br />management interests and environmen- <br />talists had supported and helped pass <br />legislation protecting 90 percent of one of <br />Colorado's most beautiful river canyons for <br />all time, while leaving a small stretch open <br />for potential future development. <br />Former Colorado Governor Dick Lamm surprised many when he came out in <br />favor of designating the entire Upper Poudre as a Wild and Scenic River This <br />was some 92 miles more than the USFS recommendation. <br />Brown went to work immediately. He <br />had a strong desire to see the Poudre <br />become Colorado's first Wild and Scenic <br />River, and he was willing to compro- <br />mise. He was also in a position to bring <br />the water management and environmental <br />communities together. In November 1983, <br />Brown invited 11 local and vocal members <br />of key water management, environmental <br />and governmental agencies to a meeting. <br />From that meeting, he created a Citizen's <br />Advisory Panel charged with reviewing the <br />USFS recommendations and advising him <br />on a course of action. <br />Brown sought a compromise that would <br />allow for designation and still leave critical <br />storage sites open for development. And <br />he knew he needed broad local support. <br />Public meetings in Fort Collins indicated <br />that the majority of residents supported <br />designation, yet a few key interests still <br />22 1 COLORADO FOUNDATION FOR WATER EDUCATION <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.