My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Citizen's Guide to Colorado's Environmental Era
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
Citizen's Guide to Colorado's Environmental Era
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2013 12:38:46 PM
Creation date
2/13/2013 3:19:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2005
Title
Citizen's Guide to Colorado's Environmental Era
Author
Colorado Foundation for Water Education
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
extract the resources of American industry, <br />but as a place to go to escape the intense <br />logic of American industry —via some new <br />industries that were growing up around a <br />more sustainable kind of Western resource <br />exploitation: rafting on rivers, fishing in <br />rivers, sitting on a cabin or condo deck on <br />the river bank and looking at rivers. Some <br />dared to argue that there was more "benefi- <br />cial use" (money- making potential) in these <br />activities than in all the high - altitude hay <br />production, tree harvest and metal mining <br />the rivers could water. <br />In 1968, some of this thinking was <br />codified in a Colorado River Basin Project <br />Act —a complex act in which the power- <br />ful Wayne Aspinall traded his support for <br />the huge Central Arizona Project down in <br />the deserts to secure funding for smaller <br />CRSP projects. But in that Act, for the first <br />time, "basic public outdoor recreation" and <br />"improving conditions for fish and wildlife" <br />were made primary purposes for dams and <br />reservoirs along the Colorado River. This <br />wasn't necessarily sympathy for the fish; <br />it was "beneficial" because humans were <br />making money off of fishermen. But it was <br />one of the first major concessions won <br />from the Old West vision: this idea that <br />humans might be able to thrive in the West <br />without having to spread the streams and <br />rivers out to dry for one economic purpose <br />or another. <br />Water users in the Upper Gunnison <br />had created a conservancy district when <br />construction began on the Aspinall Project <br />dams. "Conservancy districts" are local <br />agencies originally established to collabo- <br />rate with the Bureau of Reclamation on <br />"participating projects" to be funded by <br />power production revenues and other fed- <br />eral sources. The Upper Gunnison River <br />Water Conservancy District had been <br />formed to develop, with Bureau funding, <br />an "Upper Gunnison Project" that would <br />have included several small high- altitude <br />reservoirs and some distribution canals. <br />Most of that plan has since been aban- <br />doned, given the drying -up of federal fund- <br />ing for water projects. <br />But the Upper Gunnison Conservancy, <br />with the counsel of the aforementioned <br />Dick Bratton, has taken a leadership role in <br />the "reconstruction" of the Taylor River. Bob <br />Jennings, of the Bureau of Reclamation's <br />Western Colorado office, suggested a "stor- <br />age credit" trade, whereby the Bureau <br />would allow some of the Uncompahgre <br />Water Users Association's Taylor Reservoir <br />Black Canyon of the Gunnison. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.