My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Artifical Recharge of Ground Water in Colorado
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
Artifical Recharge of Ground Water in Colorado
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2013 12:43:49 PM
Creation date
2/13/2013 2:55:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2004
Title
Artificial Recharge of Ground Water in Colorado
Author
Colorado Geological Survey Department of Natural Resources
Description
A Statewide Assessment 2004
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Artificial Recharge of Ground Water in Colorado <br />A Statewide Assessment <br />Direct Iniection <br />Direct injection differs from infiltration systems by recharging water directly into the saturated <br />zone of the confined or unconfined aquifer. Direct injection is accomplished through a well in <br />situations where the target aquifer is deep, confined, or contains impermeable layers. Injection <br />well design styles vary with hydrogeological conditions and operation modes. Operational <br />modes also vary depending on project objectives. Wells may be used solely as injection wells <br />with the water extracted at remote locations, or the wells can serve for both injection and <br />extraction in an aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) application. The wells occupy very little <br />land surface area and can be compatible with nearly any type of existing land use. The <br />technology can also take advantage of existing water supply infrastructure, however, initial <br />design, installation, and O &M can be costly relative to infiltration recharge systems. Source <br />water must be of the highest quality and underground injection permitting is required. Since <br />there is no evaporation, losses are limited to the small quantities of water pumped during routine <br />well maintenance. <br />Injection well applications, shown in Figure IV -3 for an unconfined aquifer and IV -4 for a <br />confined aquifer, are described below. <br />Injection well — A well is completed in the saturated portion of an aquifer whether it be <br />unconfined or confined. Water is injected into the well casing through an injection pipe, <br />and the resulting head buildup causes the recharge water to flow out of the well screens <br />into the surrounding aquifer. <br />ASR well — ASR wells function as dual - purpose wells in which recharge and recovery <br />from the aquifer occurs within a single well boring. Water is injected for storage to be <br />recovered at a later date, hence the term aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) well. <br />Injection may be through a separate injection pipe, or through the pump column equipped <br />with a special down -hole flow control valve. Installed well pumps not only enable <br />recovery of stored water, but also allow periodic cycling to redevelop the wells, thus <br />maintaining their injection capacity. ASR wells have proven to be cost - effective, and can <br />be readily implemented within existing water utility facilities using well fields. <br />• Radial well — This is a large- diameter, cased borehole installed into the saturated zone of <br />an aquifer with screened pipes extending horizontally away from the casing some <br />distance into the aquifer. These installations potentially increase the surface area open to <br />the aquifer as well as the radius of influence of a well allowing higher injection or <br />extraction rates than a traditional well. <br />• Horizontal /directional well — This technology is relatively unproven for water supply <br />applications. A well is installed such that it approaches a horizontal orientation at depth. <br />The technology allows for longer screened intervals and, in theory, higher well yields <br />than a traditional vertical well installation, particularly in thinly bedded aquifers. <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.