My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Colorado Water Dec 2003
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
Colorado Water Dec 2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2013 12:58:16 PM
Creation date
2/13/2013 11:42:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2003
Title
Colorado Water
CWCB Section
Administration
Author
Water Center of Colorado State University
Description
December 2003 Issue
Publications - Doc Type
Newsletter
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TAMARISK <br />Beetles to feast on tamarisk <br />The U.S. Department of Agriculture plans to release Asian beetles in 13 Western states next spring to combat the tamarisk shrub that is clog- <br />ging riverbanks and sucking up water faster than any weed in the West. The Diorhabda elongata, otherwise known as the saltcedar leaf beetle, <br />is a pencil- eraser -size yellow bug that gobbles its way through the thick vegetation of tough -to -kill tamarisk but does not eat other plants. The <br />beetle is native to China and Kazakhstan, areas where tamarisk is native and the beetles keep it in check. Tamarisk now covers nearly 2 million <br />acres and guzzles enough water to supply 20 million people. The plan sidesteps one of the biggest controversies over using beetles for tama- <br />risk control. The bugs will be released only above the 38th parallel, which corresponds to the southern border of Colorado. That means the <br />endangered Southwest willow flycatcher - the only species that is known to use tamarisk for a habitat - is not expected to be affected. The birds <br />have not been found this far north. And the species of beetle being released does not survive and multiply below that latitude. The beetle has <br />been studied in its native habitat in Asia since the 1950s. In the United States, it has been studied in cages built around tamarisk stands since <br />1998 at a handful of research sites around the West, including one Colorado site near Pueblo. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation slides from those <br />sites show tamarisks stripped of most of their leaves, while nearby cottonwoods and Russian olive trees were green and untouched. <br />The Denver Post / October 23, 2003 <br />WATER QUALITY <br />Contamination threat / Missile sites may be leaking chemicals <br />Thirteen Atlas Series D and E missile sites in Northern Colorado, Wyoming and Nebraska are being investigated and could be slated for <br />cleanup. Petroleum chemicals and cleaning solvents associated with missile drills conducted by troops are believed to have contaminated soil <br />and groundwater at many of the sites. Five Colorado sites have been identified as contaminated or possibly contaminated. They are in Bellvue <br />in Larimer County; Windsor, Nunn and Hereford in Weld County; and Briggsdale in the Pawnee National Grasslands. All are Atlas Series E <br />sites, where chemicals were used to clean surfaces and flush fuel tanks and then dumped on the ground, Skog said. Investigators, who have <br />spent more than $6 million on analysis, in 1995 at a former Atlas site near Kimball, Neb., discovered trichloro- ethylene, or TCE, a powerful <br />cleaning solvent used by troops, Skog said. "We have a one - mile -long plume there," he added. A plume indicates that chemicals are travel- <br />ing underground in groundwater, posing a potential public health hazard. Former Site 13 in Bellvue, north of Fort Collins off U.S. Highway <br />287 about a mile north of Ted's Place, is in the opening stages of investigation. There are about 25 homes within a mile of the site, which is <br />undergoing well water testing for contamination. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, so far none of the sites are known to <br />have contaminated drinking water. <br />Coloradoan / October 19, 2003 <br />Boulder Creek study finds traces of caffeine, ibuprofen, hormones in water <br />When Boulder Creek flows from its headwaters high in the mountains, it's nearly pristine. But by the time it reaches east Boulder County, the <br />creek has picked up some strange microscopic passengers — ranging from caffeine to trace amounts of prescription drugs. Scientists studied <br />water - quality levels all along the Boulder Creek to try to figure out where contaminants are introduced. They also hope their research can be <br />used to develop better water- safety standards. Scientists are still trying to figure out what impact those chemicals could have on water quality, <br />said Sheila Murphy, a U.S. Geological Survey scientist who worked on a three -year study. Chris Rudkin, water - quality coordinator for the <br />city of Boulder, said the first -of- its -kind study would give politicians and scientists the information they need to keep water safe. Using new <br />technology unavailable until only recently, scientists were able to detect sometimes bizarre H2O additives at very low levels — a few parts per <br />billion or trillion, something they haven't been able to do before, Murphy said. "A lot of these technologies are new within the last 10 years," <br />she said. And the chemicals they're finding aren't things you'd expect to find in drinking water: EDTA, a "metal complexing agent" found in <br />mayonnaise, shampoo and vitamin supplements; Tylenol; nicotine; hormones; and prescription drugs. But the chemical scientists really didn't <br />expect to find was gadolinium, a very rare substance injected into patients receiving magnetic resonance imaging scans. While the creek's wa- <br />ter quality levels meet current water quality standards, Murphy said those standards were written before scientists could detect chemicals like <br />gadolinium. Murphy and other USGS scientists hope their research gives politicians better information to use when they draw up water quality <br />standards. <br />Boulder Dailv Camera / October 29, 2003 <br />EPA to ease sewage treatment rules <br />The Bush administration is shifting policy so cities and towns can skip a required treatment procedure for sewage they pump into rivers, lakes <br />and coastal waters during high rains. The change aims to settle years of disputes over how municipal sewage plants handle the increased flow <br />of waste – mainly storm runoff – that comes during wet weather. At issue is whether local governments should have to spend billions of tax <br />dollars upgrading those plants so peak flows of sewage can get all the sanitary treatment that federal law demands in normal conditions. The <br />administration's plan would let hundreds of communities big and small escape that expense by partially treating sewage surges in big storms. <br />Environmental groups and some federal regulators say those flows should be treated completely to keep disease - carrying microbes out of rec- <br />reational waters. The Environmental protection Agency plans to propose the policy change this week, and there will be 60 days for public <br />comment before it can be finalized. <br />USA TODAY / November 3, 2003 <br />36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.