DAM SAFETY
<br />Recreationists return to Horsetooth
<br />After nearly 4 years, $77 million and almost 26,000 truckloads of sand and gravel, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation project to renovate Horse-
<br />tooth Reservoir's four earthen dams is basically complete. That means the water level will be allowed to return to its capacity for the first time
<br />since 1999. To reduce seepage from the dam, USGR originally intended to install a concrete cutoff wall through Horsetooth Dam's middle but
<br />later scrapped that plan in favor of a 2- to 3 -foot clay and synthetic "blanket" covering the base of the dam. It's designed to prevent seepage
<br />through the foundation of the dam and also comes at a savings of $19 million. The entire project comes in $28 million under its $105 million
<br />budget. Monitoring and surveillance of the dams will continue. Gauges known as piezometers have been installed in each of the dams – in-
<br />cluding more than 20 in Horsetooth Dam along – to track water pressure.
<br />Fort Collins Coloradoan, October 22, 2003
<br />Senator seeks dam safety funds
<br />A measure has been introduced in the U.S. Senate that would authorize nearly a five -fold funding increase – exceeding $500 million a year
<br />– to improve the safety of aging dams in Colorado and across the West. The measure by Sen. Pete Domenici, R -N.M., would amend the 1978
<br />Safety -of -Dams Act by increasing authorized appropriation levels to $540 million annually for USBR dam safety projects. The Act funded the
<br />nearly complete $77 million renovation of four dams at Horsetooth Reservoir west of Fort Collins.
<br />Fort Collins Coloradoan, October 22, 2003
<br />DROUGHT
<br />Three - quarters of American West still considered in drought
<br />Water experts attending a national conference in Denver say more than 75 percent of the American West still is deep in a drought, and no one
<br />knows how long it will last. The conference, Water 2025, was part of a federal initiative launched by Interior Secretary Gale Norton in June.
<br />So far, more than 3,000 people have gathered at nine conferences to identify ways to better manage and share the West's water supplies. One
<br />of the concerns discussed was a forecast from the U.S. Geological Survey that temperatures could rise an average of 5.4 degrees by as early as
<br />2025. That would change the spring runoff from the mountains, affecting supplies, evaporation, stream flow and temperatures and fish health.
<br />Associated Press / Durango Herald / November 5, 2003
<br />Global warming could overburden city system
<br />A recent city- sponsored study by Hydrosphere Resource Consultants concluded that a little conservation would give Boulder enough water
<br />to meet the demand of future growth in non - drought years. But if global warming dries the area, the city's current system won't be able to
<br />quench the population's thirst. The study completed for the city's water utility and Planning Department in September looked at Boulder's
<br />water rights, typical stream flows, 300 years of tree ring data and various levels of future population and job growth in the city. It calculated
<br />whether Boulder would have enough water to meet city service standards under historic weather averages and if global warming cut stream
<br />flows by at least 15 percent. If Boulder grew to a population of 126,300 residents and was home to 216,700 jobs — the "build out" levels un-
<br />der current zoning — some conservation measures would give the city a reliable enough water supply to meet its minimum service standards.
<br />In a climate made hotter, drier and with more dramatic weather swings due to global warming, the city would need to increase its reservoir
<br />storage space or cut the typical household's use, the study found. "The chance that climate change could overburden Boulder's current water
<br />supply is enough to warrant beginning to plan for it," said Steve Pomerance, a former City Council member long concerned about water re-
<br />sources and future growth in the city.
<br />Boulder Daily Camera / November 3, 2003
<br />SALINITY
<br />River salinity study / Too much salt for maximum yields
<br />Tim Gates of Colorado State University has been studying salinity in the soil and water of the Arkansas Valley for five years, with sometimes
<br />surprising results. Gates began his study in the area between Manzanola and John Martin Reservoir for the first three years, and last year
<br />expanded it to include the area downstream from John Martin to the Kansas border. The problems being studied are high water tables which
<br />create waterlogged and saline soils and reduce the yield of farm crops; and dissolution of salts within the aquifer, which carries salts and other
<br />pollutants back into the river. Salinity increases from west to east along the Arkansas Valley, but the bulk of the salts are inherent in the soil
<br />rather than being transported from upstream reaches of the valley, Gates told the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District board. In
<br />the blistering drought of 2002, both the depth of the water table and the salinity level in ground water diminished. "It's interesting that as the
<br />water table falls the salinity also falls," Gates said. "The (geologic) formations where the salts are being dissolved are in the upper levels of the
<br />water table." But even the drought- reduced levels of salinity, and even in the least saline areas, the soil salts are too high for maximum crop
<br />yields, he said. He estimates crop yield reduction at 13 percent, or $68 lost per acre, between 1999 and 2001 in the upstream study area. The
<br />yield reduction ranges to 20 percent loss in higher - salinity areas. Some possible solutions, he said, may lie in more efficient irrigation systems
<br />such as drip irrigation; lining canals to reduce seepage; and installing subsurface drainage systems. "We need to study further what will be the
<br />effect if more fanners go to drip systems, trading their canal water for well Pumping," Gates said.
<br />Pueblo Chieftain / October 19, 2003
<br />35
<br />
|