Laserfiche WebLink
for weather- related catastrophes in 1998 alone seeking these rewards retire, build, buy, and <br />topped that of the entire decade of the 1980s. advertise. Each action is rational and carries no <br />Humans may not cause the wind to blow or the negative consequences for the actor. In combi- <br />ground to shake or the rain to fall (though even nation, however, they are deadly. Like the rocks <br />that is increasingly being called into question), cascading down Babbitf s mountainside, they <br />but they do unquestionably shape the results are individually benign, but in combination they <br />that follow whenever the wind blows or the put people in severe danger. <br />ground shakes or the rain falls. <br />The last step in making a hurricane or any other <br />Next the question is how does all of that stuff get natural disaster is the distribution of its effects. <br />into vulnerable places? The answer is: through Women and children die in greater numbers <br />countless ordinary decisions and actions un- than adult men in Third World earthquakes be- <br />dertaken entirely innocently of their impact on cause they are disproportionately likely to be in <br />hurricane vulnerability. When couples from the homes and other poorly constructed buildings; <br />frigid upper Midwest dream of retirement on adult men are more likely to find themselves in <br />the Gulf Coast, the hurricane risk goes up a little. workplaces, government buildings, and other <br />When the federal government makes home loans more solid structures <br />or finances highway k <br />construction in South <br />Florida to promote <br />economic growth or <br />reward political sup- <br />port or whatever, the <br />hurricane risk goes up. <br />When coastal boost- <br />ers advertise sunshine, <br />boating, and golf but <br />neglect to mention the <br />periodic evacuations, <br />the hurricane risk goes <br />up. The truth is there <br />is a system in place, <br />a system that has no <br />designer or control- <br />ler but plenty of par- <br />ticipants. It is a system <br />that rewards people <br />for putting themselves <br />and their property (and <br />other people and their <br />property) in dangerous <br />places. These rewards <br />are short -term but <br />significant —return on <br />investment, a nice vaca- <br />tion, insurance policies, <br />a monthly paycheck, a <br />govermnent contract, <br />a home loan, re -elec- <br />tion. Most of the time it <br />works safely, as people <br />22 <br />when the ground sha es. <br />Poor people have a <br />harder time evacuating <br />in the cases of floods and <br />hurricanes because they <br />lack good access to trans- <br />portation and the ex- <br />tended social networks <br />that allow them some- <br />where else to go. Even <br />in something as simple <br />as a heat wave, elderly <br />people living alone <br />invisibly roast to death <br />in unairconditioned <br />apartments and public <br />housing units, cut off <br />from family, friends, and <br />neighbors, sometimes <br />having locked the doors <br />and windows for fear of <br />danger from their crime - <br />infested surroundings. <br />None of this is to deny <br />the real and widespread <br />suffering of middle- and <br />upper -class people in the <br />aftermath of disasters. <br />Nor is it to suggest that <br />anyone deliberately dis- <br />criminates against these <br />least among us such dire <br />times. But it is inescap- <br />able that disasters are <br />