My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Colorado Water June 2006
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
Colorado Water June 2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2013 1:03:58 PM
Creation date
2/8/2013 5:00:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2006
Title
Colorado Water
Author
Water Center of Colorado State University
Description
Colorado Water Newsletter June 2006
Publications - Doc Type
Newsletter
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
somewhere else. That's how the relative value of water has <br />changed in the last decade. <br />If you understand water, you understand all the fascinating <br />interplays and relationships, There are going to be debates. <br />There are court cases going on right now regarding who owns <br />the water. The beauty of Western America is its resounding af- <br />firmation of private property rights. That's what we believe. <br />An important part of the debate in the next few years is em- <br />bracing the reality that there's going to be water produced, and <br />that water can be cleaned at reasonable cost where it fits within <br />the context of the economies of the western states. We need <br />the water, and the drought is going to force us to do the right <br />thing. Everybody who understands western politics, western <br />interstate relationships, recognizes that water is a valuable <br />commodity. When I spoke at the Ruckelshaus Institute in <br />Wyoming, I commented that water and disposal should not be <br />in the same sentence. Water is much too valuable a commod- <br />ity. Certainly we won't use every acre -foot or every barrel of <br />it in a beneficial way. `Beneficial use' is a term that people in <br />the water world use; we won't beneficially use every bit of it, <br />but we're darn sure going to start using more than we're using <br />today — because we have to. <br />The beauty of a conference like this is that it brings people <br />with different mindsets — some speaking in barrels and some <br />speaking in acre -feet — together in a room to allow them <br />to start talking about how we deal with this. As Mr. Yates <br />said, this is one of the all -time fun things because it can be a <br />win -win. We must use the technology that's emerging in our <br />country and worldwide. <br />10 <br />American resourcefulness <br />We have the opportunity in the West to have that new water. <br />We're going to build the storage. We're also going to use <br />produced water in a beneficial way. Senator Domenici of New <br />Mexico heads a produced -water subcommittee, and the subject <br />is going to be debated in the Senate and the House. I think <br />that's a discussion we all ought to be looking at because there <br />might be ways to use that vehicle to enhance the technology <br />and the demonstration capability. <br />One of the things that I hope will come out of this conference <br />is a message to these agencies. We have to have some interac- <br />tions between the different agencies. In Wyoming, it took us <br />25 years to permit a water project that we saw for the first time <br />last fall — imagine, 25 years! I can tell you that Mr. Yates and <br />a major oil company can't wait 25 years for permits to get the <br />job done. <br />At the same time we must exercise environmental responsibil- <br />ity. We have grazing permits on the Colorado/Wyoming line, <br />and when I go to some well areas where there've been pipe- <br />lines, I can see the little grooves where the seeder has passed <br />over but there's no grass, no seed because the reclamation <br />wasn't done, or — if it was done — it wasn't done with thought. <br />American farmers are the greatest farmers in the history of the <br />world. If we can't figure out a way with water and seed and <br />using our heads to do reclamation, that's our fault. However, <br />the beauty of BLM/Fish & Wildlife Service/EPA interaction is <br />that if people put their heads together, they can find magic in <br />this opportunity of produced water. <br />Correction <br />The project described in "SCADA Employed in Middle Rio Grande Valley to <br />Help Deliver Water Efficiently ", which appeared on page 10 in the April 2006 <br />issue of Colorado Water, is funded in part by the Middle Rio Grande Endan- <br />gered Species Act Collaborative Program and the New Mexico State Interstate <br />Stream Commission. The Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District Office <br />in Albuquerque and its Division field offices provided their full support in <br />planning and implementation of the project. The project is described in more <br />detail by the FY 2004 Project Report to the New Mexico Interstate Stream <br />Commission, March 2006, prepared by Dr. Ramchand Oad, with assistance <br />from researchers at Colorado State University and in collaboration with S.S. <br />Papadopulos & Associates, Inc. The support of these people and organizations <br />is gratefully acknowledged. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.