My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Western States Water Council 2005 Report
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
Western States Water Council 2005 Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2013 1:47:23 PM
Creation date
2/6/2013 4:50:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2001
Title
Western States Water Council Annual Report 2001
Author
Western States Water Council
Description
Annual report 2001
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
There is a significant need for the federal government to maintain and rehabilitate its existing <br />water storage infrastructure, and to work with states and others in providing reliable water data. In <br />particular, as Congress considers the budget, we urge it to recognize the serious need for adequate <br />and consistent federal funding to maintain, restore, modernize, and provide for targeted expansion and USGS's <br />of NWCC's SNOTEL System and Soil and l Program, with a primary focus <br />Cooperative Streamgaging Program and National Stream Information <br />on coordinated data collection and dissemination. I have appended a position recently adopted by <br />the Council explaining the western states' position in support of these programs. <br />Finally, I wish to reiterate the importance of the long -held Congressional policy of deference <br />to states regarding water management. States are moving to address the challenges they face in <br />water resources. Federal preemption of state authority is not the way to address the complex <br />challenges associated with water management in the West. Rather, what is necessary is encouraging <br />partnerships between the state and federal agencies in the development and implementation of key <br />policies, supporting the pivotal role states must play in addressing these challenges, and affording <br />flexibility for ongoing innovation at the state level in order to effectively carry out this role. Thank <br />you. <br />Water Information Management Systems Workshop <br />The Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources hosted the WSWC's annual <br />Water Information Management Systems Workshop in Reno, Nevada on July 24 -26th. <br />Representatives from twelve states discussed information management needs and challenges, <br />involving water rights and water use mapping and imaging, computing evapotranspiration, reporting <br />consumptive uses and losses, decision support systems, implementing water quality standards, <br />managing ground water resources and databases, and modeling water availability. Technical <br />presentations also addressed software and hardware issues, applications and alternatives, as well as <br />database migration issues. Several states demonstrated uses of the internet to deliver state services <br />and allow for greater interaction with users. Lastly, attendees discussed activities of the Federal <br />Advisory Committee on Water Information (ACWI), the U.S. Geological Survey's National Stream - <br />gaging Information Program (NSIP), cooperative state /federal streamgaging activities, and the <br />Natural Resources Conservation Service's snow survey and water supply forecasting program. <br />Symposia on Endangered Species and Water Law in the West <br />The Southwest <br />Albuquerque, New Mexico <br />The New Mexico State Engineer's Office and New Mexico Interstate Streams Commission <br />hosted the Albuquerque symposium, June 27 -29th. Eluid Martinez, former Commissioner of the <br />U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, former New Mexico State Engineer, and a former member of the <br />Western States Water Council was a featured speaker. He questioned the intent of the Congress with <br />respect to ESA and any priority over other laws, but recognized we now have to deal with it. As <br />Commissioner he was responsible for Section 7 consultations over federal project operations. While <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.