Laserfiche WebLink
ateunrizatinn of .TMR Anrmtnflna Tcr»ne <br />Issue <br />Number <br />Issue <br />i <br />L <br />P z <br />T s <br />KS Staff positi )n <br />CO Staff Position <br />KS Staff Comment <br />. ' <br />CO Staff Comment <br />Operations Committee or other <br />general Comment(s) <br />31 <br />Sections H (E)(4) <br />Deficits of Kansas <br />Section III D states: <br />Deficit to be restored. to <br />Deficit to be restored to <br />Kansas to work on this issue. <br />and III (D) are <br />Section 11 deliveries due <br />"First transfers from <br />Kansas Section U : <br />Kansas "transit loss <br />unclear as to where <br />transit loss sho.tage <br />deliveries shall make up <br />account as soon, as <br />account As; as <br />Kevin Salter letter of 26 August <br />transfers to make <br />should b,, replenished to <br />any deficits, if any, in <br />additional wvatei° <br />additional water <br />2003 <br />up deficits should <br />a <br />the Kansas Section II <br />the Kansas Transit Loss <br />becomes;available in <br />becomes available in <br />account..." (emphasis <br />be made <br />account. <br />transit loss account. <br />transit loss account. <br />added) <br />Kansas; t4, pro pose <br />Kansas to propose <br />clarifyln resolution <br />clarifying resolution. <br />32* <br />How should transit <br />Based on the <br />*Issue added 24 October 2003 at <br />loss account be <br />interpretation proposed <br />meeting between staffs. <br />used? <br />by Kevin Salters; letter.. . <br />(21 October 2003)'thexe <br />p° <br />is a question of whether <br />the transit loss releases`° <br />are a front or back "side <br />operation. <br />40 <br />Exchange of daily <br />Daily determinations_of <br />DailVr,'determinations of <br />The Operations and <br />The Operations and <br />Resolved <br />reservoir status <br />the difference between <br />the difference between <br />Assistant Operations <br />Assistant Operations <br />accounting <br />accounts and physical <br />aFqQtipt ,P arXd,physical <br />Secretaries should <br />Secretaries should <br />o <br />measurements at the <br />measurements at the <br />continue to exchange <br />continue to exchange <br />reservoir are an integral ":. <br />reservoir are an integral <br />data. <br />data. <br />part of the daily <br />part. of the daily <br />Resolved <br />accowittr,g. . ` <br />accounting. <br />41 <br />Non - reporting of <br />Need daily accounting <br />All data and data <br />Kansas will work on analyzing the <br />Section II(C)(1) <br />of non account water for <br />interpretations related to <br />accuracy of the amount of water <br />determinations <br />compliance with:this <br />JMR operations should <br />passing through the reservoir under <br />Section of the - -1980 <br />be reported in annual <br />this section. <br />Operating Plan. <br />reports. <br />2002issues table09.doc Joint work product — 24 October 2003 Draft Issues Table — For discussion purposes only <br />