Laserfiche WebLink
atenrization of JMR Accountinu hguec <br />Issue <br />Operations Committee or other <br />Number <br />Issue <br />L' <br />PZ <br />T3 <br />KS Staff position <br />CO Staff Position <br />KS Staff Comment <br />CO Staff Comment <br />general Comment(s) <br />22 <br />Criteria for <br />The criteria used by <br />ARCA should establish <br />Co(pr,.4do feels that any <br />The Operation Secretary and the <br />determining <br />Colorado fails to adhere <br />criteria for determining <br />consideration of changes <br />Assistant Operation Secretary <br />Section III storage <br />b <br />to what was established <br />the water available 'for <br />is prevented during the <br />should continue to work on this <br />under the Pueblo <br />N <br />under the 1980 <br />Section III storage in <br />pendency of the lawsuit, <br />issue. (10 May 2002) <br />Winter Water <br />Operating Plan in that <br />]MR to protect inflows <br />thus cannot be resolved. <br />Storage Program <br />other water under <br />to conservation storage. <br />(PWWSP) <br />; <br />Section III. <br />Water delivere. to JMR <br />under the?'`WWSP <br />should meetthose <br />criteria. <br />23 <br />Reporting of <br />Although it is not%, 411ed., <br />:. <br />The Operation Secretary <br />Resolved: The Operation <br />Winter Water vs. <br />for by the 1980 <br />has committed to <br />Secretary has agreed to provide the <br />Winter Compact <br />b <br />Operating Plan, th <br />provide to ARCA the <br />method and the data used to <br />storage split <br />> <br />request is reasonable.. <br />split ratios, how those <br />determine the split between winter <br />calculation <br />0 <br />were determined, and <br />water storage and conservation <br />the basis for any <br />storage. <br />adjustments to the split <br />Resolved <br />through the season. <br />30 <br />Determination of <br />Criteria for determtnt►g <br />Some base criteria are <br />*Colorado believes that <br />The Operation Secretary and the <br />transit loss under <br />transit loss for Kansas.: <br />needed to address the <br />there is a Policy issue in <br />Assistant Operation Secretary <br />Section II(E)(4) <br />Section 1I deliveries are <br />' .' . <br />timing of the <br />how any criteria <br />should continue to work on this <br />needed, and should <br />measurements of Kansas <br />developed is applied <br />issue. (10 May 2002) <br />include turielin� s of <br />Section II account <br />retroactively. This is a <br />delivery. <br />releases. *Kansas <br />potential impediment to <br />Q°, <br />concurs that there is a <br />resolving this issue. <br />potential impediment to <br />resolving this issue on <br />how this is applied <br />retroactively. <br />2002issues table09.doc Joint work product — 24 October 2003 Draft Issues Table — For discussion purposes only <br />