Laserfiche WebLink
4B1 &2 Winter Water Account of convenience and timely distribution of 35% <br />storage charge <br />• Without providing comment concerning Colorado's 5/02 <br />proposed resolution, Kansas verbally offered an alternative idea <br />for consideration... Colorado requested consideration of and <br />response to its proposal before entertaining additional ideas. <br />4B3 Criteria for determining storage of Section III vs. Compact water <br />• Kansas reported that it has not revised its alternative accounting <br />procedure in response to Colorado's criticisms, however, they <br />are in the process of converting the application to Excel format <br />prior to making those changes <br />• Colorado responded to a criticism of the comparison of current <br />conservation storage to that of the 1950 -1975 period that had <br />been provided for review by revising the data used to be <br />consistent with that in the ARCA annual reports and provided a <br />revised summary for Kansas' review <br />• Kansas also noted that the comparison would be more <br />meaningful if it were to be adjusted to account for the fact that <br />during the 1950 -1975 period conservation storage was affected <br />by the 100 cfs pass through provision pursuant to Article V (A) <br />of the Compact. <br />4C1 Appropriate determination of transit loss under Section 11 (E)(4) <br />• Kansas reported no progress in reviewing the Ley report, <br />however, a request was made for the underlying data and <br />analysis in order to facilitate verification of the conclusions. <br />• Colorado renewed its request for daily diversion records by <br />Kansas ditches for the period concurrent with and subsequent to <br />each demand for Section H account water releases from 1980 to <br />the present to be used to determine the period of time following <br />the end of a release made for Kansas during which Kansas <br />ditches generally continue to benefit from the release operation. <br />This should aid in formulating an appropriate definition of transit <br />loss to be us-.d in such determinations. <br />4C2 Appropriate accounting procedure to be us;;d :;n s:.ttl °meat for deficit in <br />dolivery of Article H to Kansas <br />• Kansas did not present a proposed resolution to clarify the <br />appropriate procedure. <br />4D2 Non - reporting of Section II(C)(1) determination <br />• Kansas provided no report to verify whether a complaint involving <br />inappropriate temporary storage or averaging of flows is alleged in <br />2002 <br />4E1 &2 Interrupted transfers from conservation storage to accounts <br />• The principle behind Kansas' concerns remain unclear <br />