Laserfiche WebLink
In addition, a follow -up workshop to further discuss the whooping crane was held at the <br />same location on February 15, 2001. The results of that workshop were a significant <br />contribution to the whooping crane section of this report. <br />Not all the recommendations made in this report were necessarily agreed to by all of the <br />workshop participants. Most minority opinions that were expressed were disputed by the <br />species experts identified by the FWS. Therefore, the information and recommendations <br />in this report tends to rely on the opinions and data presented by those species experts. <br />This report follows the Scope of Work and Consulting Agreement dated June 23, 2000. <br />The subcontractor completed a draft report on October 22, 2001. The draft report was <br />distributed to workshop participants and the 8 species experts that were unable to attend <br />a workshop for their technical review and comment. A copy of the draft was also <br />distributed to the CA's Governance Committee. All comments received were considered <br />in preparing this report. <br />Interior Least Tern and Piping Plover <br />The Recovery Plan for the Northern Great Plains population of piping plovers states a <br />goal of 465 piping plover pairs for all of Nebraska and 140 pairs (280 adults) maintained <br />for 15 years for the Platte River. The Recovery Plan for the interior least tern states a <br />goal of 1520 adults for all of Nebraska and 750 adult breeding birds maintained for 10 <br />years for the Platte River. It is recommended that the FWS continue to recognize these as <br />valid population recovery goals unless they are changed through the FWS recovery <br />planning process. Both recovery plans were written without much knowledge or <br />consideration of least tern and piping plover activity on the North Platte River (including <br />Lake McConaughy) and the South Platte River in Nebraska. Therefore, the goals for the <br />Platte River in the existing recovery plans exclude North and South Platte River birds. <br />However, birds on the North Platte River (including Lake McConaughy) and the South <br />Platte River should not be ignored for their potential contribution to the overall species <br />recovery goals. <br />The purpose of this report is to identify species recovery objectives for the "central" <br />Platte River because it is this area where intensive management and monitoring will be <br />directed under the Platte River Cooperative Agreement and eventual Recovery Program. <br />' Identifying objectives for the central Platte River is not intended to ignore the importance <br />of the Lower Platte River, North Platte River or South Platte River for their contribution <br />to least tern and piping plover recovery. It is recognized that terns and plovers in the <br />' Platte River system interact with each other, and birds on the central Platte River should <br />not be considered a separate population. The central Platte River for this report is <br />defined as from Lexington to Columbus, Nebraska, because Columbus is where major <br />' tributaries, principally the Loup River, enter the Platte River and where the Platte River <br />changes character. <br />11 <br />