My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Species Recovery Objectives for Four Target Species in the Central and Lower Platte River
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Species Recovery Objectives for Four Target Species in the Central and Lower Platte River
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2013 12:42:46 PM
Creation date
1/30/2013 4:30:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
6/26/2002
Author
James M. Lutey, Subcontractor for URS Greiner Woodward Clyde
Title
Species Recovery Objectives for Four Target Species in the Central and Lower Platte River (Whooping Crane, Interior Least Tern, Piping Plover, Pallid Sturgeon)
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />The Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) believes it is important to know more specifically <br />the number of individuals or other measurable biological responses that could be <br />supported by the central Platte River and contribute to the recovery of the least tern, <br />piping plover, and whooping crane and that could be supported by the lower Platte River <br />and contribute to the recovery of the pallid sturgeon. Pursuant to its responsibilities <br />under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), the FWS initiated an effort to <br />determine if species recovery objectives specific to the Platte River could be developed. <br />Establishing species recovery objectives is not being done as part of the Platte River <br />Cooperative Agreement (CA) process. This report identifies recovery objectives, to the <br />extent possible, and makes other recommendations for the least tern, piping plover, and <br />whooping crane in the central Platte River and for the pallid sturgeon in the lower Platte <br />River. Achieving recovery objectives alone, however, does not determine species <br />recovery. "Recovery" only occurs when the reasons for listing the species (e.g., threats) <br />have been removed. The information and recommendations in this report can be used by <br />the FWS and others in focusing recovery activities for these species along the Platte <br />River, including future monitoring and research activities and long -term planning efforts. <br />This report can also be utilized by the respective species recovery teams when preparing <br />future amendments to species recovery plans. Information and recommendations in this <br />report are based on pooled expert opinion and are subject to modification when new <br />information indicates that change is appropriate. <br />The FWS identified a number of individuals who possess broad knowledge and expertise <br />about the four target species, and the subcontractor conducted workshops to gather expert <br />opinion and data in developing species objectives. The purpose was to select a <br />manageable number of experts (approximately eight to ten per species) that were very <br />knowledgeable of the biology and needs of the species throughout their entire ranges <br />and/or on the Platte River. The subcontractor used the workshop results, scientific data, <br />and collaboration with the FWS in preparing this report and its recommendations. <br />A major contribution to this report was a workshop of species experts for all four target <br />species that was conducted on September 26 -27, 2000, at the Platte River Whooping <br />Crane Habitat Maintenance Trust facility near Wood River, Nebraska. Sessions were <br />held with three separate species groups (whooping crane, pallid sturgeon, and least <br />tern/piping plover). All three groups operated by consensus, with minority and majority <br />opinions recorded. The groups used the best available scientific data, knowledge and <br />judgements in their deliberations. There were 34 individuals who participated in all or <br />part of the workshop. There were eight species experts that were unable to attend the <br />workshop. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.