My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Species Recovery Objectives for Four Target Species in the Central and Lower Platte River
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Species Recovery Objectives for Four Target Species in the Central and Lower Platte River
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2013 12:42:46 PM
Creation date
1/30/2013 4:30:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
6/26/2002
Author
James M. Lutey, Subcontractor for URS Greiner Woodward Clyde
Title
Species Recovery Objectives for Four Target Species in the Central and Lower Platte River (Whooping Crane, Interior Least Tern, Piping Plover, Pallid Sturgeon)
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
B. WHOOPING CRANE <br />1. Habitat on the central Platte River should be managed for 100 percent of <br />the recovered Aransas/Wood Buffalo Population (AWP) of whooping cranes (1000 <br />birds). <br />2. From a spacial distribution standpoint, suitable habitat for whooping cranes <br />in each of the 10 bridge segments seems sufficient if it were available. <br />3. The approximately 2900 -acre habitat complex per each of 10 bridge <br />segments (as discussed in the Platte River Management Joint Study and referenced <br />in the Cooperative Agreement) is preferred. However, smaller units may still be <br />beneficial to whooping cranes if they contain suitable whooping crane habitat and <br />are sufficient in number and spacing to be detectable to cranes flying over the Platte <br />River. Therefore, some flexibility in layout and size of the complexes could be <br />accommodated, but these areas should be protected from disturbance and contain <br />certain key habitat parameters. <br />4. The habitat complexes should not be a substitute for maintaining the <br />ecological integrity of the Platte River system. <br />5. There should be more research on what habitat best provides benefits for <br />whooping cranes along the Platte River. <br />6. A more detailed statistical analysis should be completed of the data <br />available, including the number of whooping crane sightings as well as the number <br />of cranes. <br />7. One or more habitat developments could be provided for whooping cranes <br />west of the central Platte River, although the feasibility of such habitat work may be <br />questionable. If it is determined at a future time that some habitat development and <br />management is feasible in the upper Platte River area, a 90:10 split in terms of the <br />proportion of whooping crane use or stopovers could be selected as a revised <br />objective at that time. That is, management should occur for 90 percent of <br />whooping crane stopovers on the central Platte River and for 10 percent of stopovers <br />west of the central Platte River. <br />8. Recognizing that population ratios are difficult to establish and monitor, <br />population ratios should be used as indices of whooping crane use of the Platte River <br />and to estimate the potential changes in use. Separate ratios should be used for fall <br />and spring populations. These population ratios should be successfully tested and <br />endorsed before they are used as standardized means of crane detection. <br />9. A whooping crane use index of bird days on the river as an additional <br />measure of habitat attractiveness should be used. <br />35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.